Connect
To Top

Kate Moss by Gui Paganini for Valisere Lingerie 2010 Campaign

Kate Moss strips down for the latest campaign from Brazilian lingerie label, Valisere. Photographed by Gui Paganini and with retouching by Alex Wink of Studio AW, the British supermodel wears sexy lace garments paired with simple tees and elegant jackets. It makes us wish it were spring already!








Shop New Styles

51 Comments

  1. Fabiana Pigna

    October 21, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    i’ve never seen Kate Moss more photoshopped in my life!

    • sarinni

      October 21, 2010 at 6:05 pm

      agree, worst kate moss story ever

      • jazzy elizabeth

        October 22, 2010 at 8:30 am

        it looks like she’s got new lips&an eye lift…

      • jazzy elizabeth

        October 22, 2010 at 8:30 am

        it looks like she’s got new lips&an eye lift…

  2. Trebntdorgan

    October 21, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    I’m pretty sure Brigitte Bardot’s lips from old 60’s photos where superimposed on this mess…I mean…

  3. ania

    October 21, 2010 at 6:03 pm

    so shopped 😉 I know it’s supposed to look sexy, but it just seems like she’s half-asleep in most of those ;P

  4. ania

    October 21, 2010 at 6:03 pm

    so shopped 😉 I know it’s supposed to look sexy, but it just seems like she’s half-asleep in most of those ;P

  5. Anik

    October 21, 2010 at 6:28 pm

    her eyes look so empty, way too much photoshop!

  6. Stephanie

    October 21, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    Kate moss is extremly gorgeous but these pictures are really way to much photoshopped..
    I mean they are beautiful but really shopped!

    Stay happy & Live.Laugh.Love.
    http://www.style1509.blogspot.com

  7. Stephanie

    October 21, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    Kate moss is extremly gorgeous but these pictures are really way to much photoshopped..
    I mean they are beautiful but really shopped!

    Stay happy & Live.Laugh.Love.
    http://www.style1509.blogspot.com

  8. Sandro S

    October 21, 2010 at 7:30 pm

    OMG SO much retouching! She almost looks like a blow-up doll!

  9. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    October 21, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    She can still work it so they have no problem hiring a great retoucher. Nothing wrong with that.
    Although I’m not exactly sure how I feel about her shooting for a lingerie campaign… lol.

  10. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    October 21, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    She can still work it so they have no problem hiring a great retoucher. Nothing wrong with that.
    Although I’m not exactly sure how I feel about her shooting for a lingerie campaign… lol.

  11. RENAM

    October 21, 2010 at 8:47 pm

    UAAAAAAAU! AHAZA GUI E FLAVIA! LINDO!!!

  12. Elle

    October 21, 2010 at 9:37 pm

    If her name weren’t in the title, I would never guess this was Kate. It doesn’t look at all like her; this could be any random, photo-chopped throw-away model.

  13. Anonymous

    October 21, 2010 at 10:19 pm

    She’s hardly recognizable. Might as well have used a plastic mannequin.

  14. Anonymous

    October 21, 2010 at 10:19 pm

    She’s hardly recognizable. Might as well have used a plastic mannequin.

  15. Anonymous

    October 21, 2010 at 10:19 pm

    She’s hardly recognizable. Might as well have used a plastic mannequin.

  16. Charles Kane

    October 22, 2010 at 2:06 am

    give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.

  17. Charles Kane

    October 22, 2010 at 2:06 am

    give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.

  18. Charles Kane

    October 22, 2010 at 2:06 am

    give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.

  19. Charles Kane

    October 22, 2010 at 2:06 am

    give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.

  20. Charles Kane

    October 22, 2010 at 2:06 am

    give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.

  21. Fernanda

    October 22, 2010 at 5:35 am

    What happened to her face?:S

    • Anna

      October 22, 2010 at 9:32 am

      Photoshop happened.

    • Anna

      October 22, 2010 at 9:32 am

      Photoshop happened.

  22. Lily

    October 22, 2010 at 9:56 am

    MONEY MONEY MONEY FOR HER!!

  23. Lena

    October 22, 2010 at 12:00 pm

    i barely recognized her … or do now :( sometimes i hate photoshop

  24. Dina

    October 22, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    ewwwww so gross. she looks like she has googley eyes. what were they thinking.

  25. Lisa

    October 22, 2010 at 4:02 pm

    I have seen much crap in my days, but this could really be the worst editorial. Ever.

  26. Anonymous

    October 22, 2010 at 4:35 pm

    Uncrecognizable. Holy mother of BAD photoshop. This is just AWFUL. I agree with comment above, one of the worst editorials I’ve ever seen.

  27. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    • Anonymous

      October 25, 2010 at 2:44 pm

      Nobody is questioning the line between fantasy and reality in fashion. At one point, when you exhaust any emotion or humanity out of an editorial, you get this. This isnt fantasy, but this isnt reality, this is JUST PLAIN BAD. Most of the comments are negative on here for a reason, so dont pretend to be a know-it-all and simply express an opinion. Thats all.

    • Anonymous

      October 25, 2010 at 2:44 pm

      Nobody is questioning the line between fantasy and reality in fashion. At one point, when you exhaust any emotion or humanity out of an editorial, you get this. This isnt fantasy, but this isnt reality, this is JUST PLAIN BAD. Most of the comments are negative on here for a reason, so dont pretend to be a know-it-all and simply express an opinion. Thats all.

  28. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  29. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  30. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  31. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  32. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  33. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  34. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  35. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  36. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  37. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  38. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  39. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  40. THX6050

    October 23, 2010 at 5:15 am

    All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

  41. Ak

    October 23, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    she looks flat in these shoots…can’t believe it…

  42. Isaobeso

    October 23, 2010 at 8:58 pm

    seriously! ir you’re going to hire Kate Moss and photo shop her….. you could hire any other model and pay much less!! ’cause for paying kate moss and doing this to her is like A TOTAL WASTE! I don’t get it at all……….. and if you ‘re not talking money, then this is an awfull editorial any ways! it is jst nonsense!! I agree with almost everyone above

  43. florence

    October 26, 2010 at 8:46 am

    what a waste of time, no creativity or edge to this shoot whatsoever. Compare this ru~’#sh to the La Perla S/S 2010 campaign with Guinevere VAN SEENUS and then you know what has gone wrong. Guinevere rocks lingerie, Kate sadly lost it a long time ago, let’s say circa CK/Marky Mark days!

  44. florence

    October 26, 2010 at 8:46 am

    what a waste of time, no creativity or edge to this shoot whatsoever. Compare this ru~’#sh to the La Perla S/S 2010 campaign with Guinevere VAN SEENUS and then you know what has gone wrong. Guinevere rocks lingerie, Kate sadly lost it a long time ago, let’s say circa CK/Marky Mark days!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in 2010