Kate Moss by Gui Paganini for Valisere Lingerie 2010 Campaign

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published October 21, 2010

Kate Moss strips down for the latest campaign from Brazilian lingerie label, Valisere. Photographed by Gui Paganini and with retouching by Alex Wink of Studio AW, the British supermodel wears sexy lace garments paired with simple tees and elegant jackets. It makes us wish it were spring already!









Recent Updates

Alaia Summer Fall 2024 Featured

Alaïa’s Summer 2024 Collection Exudes Effortless Elegance

Alaïa debuts its summer-fall 2024 campaign with a focus on elegant silhouettes. Featuring model Loli Bahia, the studio portraits captured ...
Bucket Hat Outfits Featured

9 Bucket Hat Outfits: Top Ways to Wear the Style

Bucket hat outfits offer the perfect blend of playfulness and versatility that can enhance any wardrobe. The bucket hat, also ...
Karl Lagerfeld Amber Valletta 2024 Feature

Amber Valletta & Karl Lagerfeld Just Dropped Eco-Friendly Bags

Amber Valletta shines in the latest Karl Lagerfeld campaign, showcasing a groundbreaking line of eco-friendly accessories that the renowed 90s ...
Angelina Frerk Bershka Beachwear Featured

Angelina Frerk Hits the Beach with Bershka’s Summer Styles

Bershka ushers in the arrival of summer with a recent editorial, “Through Summer,” featuring the German model and influencer Angelina ...
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Outfits Featured

Jenna Ortega & Winona Ryder Bring Back Goth Chic in Beetlejuice Beetlejuice

With the much-anticipated release of Beetlejuice Beetlejuice, the goth aesthetic is poised for a major comeback. The film, a sequel ...
Yumi Lambert Bazaar Featured

Yumi Lambert Is in a Pastel Utopia for Harper’s Bazaar Turkey

Yumi Lambert shines in Harper's Bazaar Turkey's May 2024 issue, bringing futuristic fashion to life. Photographed by Emre Doğru, the ...

51 thoughts on “Kate Moss by Gui Paganini for Valisere Lingerie 2010 Campaign”

  1. She can still work it so they have no problem hiring a great retoucher. Nothing wrong with that.
    Although I’m not exactly sure how I feel about her shooting for a lingerie campaign… lol.

    Reply
  2. She can still work it so they have no problem hiring a great retoucher. Nothing wrong with that.
    Although I’m not exactly sure how I feel about her shooting for a lingerie campaign… lol.

    Reply
  3. If her name weren’t in the title, I would never guess this was Kate. It doesn’t look at all like her; this could be any random, photo-chopped throw-away model.

    Reply
  4. Uncrecognizable. Holy mother of BAD photoshop. This is just AWFUL. I agree with comment above, one of the worst editorials I’ve ever seen.

    Reply
  5. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
    • Nobody is questioning the line between fantasy and reality in fashion. At one point, when you exhaust any emotion or humanity out of an editorial, you get this. This isnt fantasy, but this isnt reality, this is JUST PLAIN BAD. Most of the comments are negative on here for a reason, so dont pretend to be a know-it-all and simply express an opinion. Thats all.

      Reply
    • Nobody is questioning the line between fantasy and reality in fashion. At one point, when you exhaust any emotion or humanity out of an editorial, you get this. This isnt fantasy, but this isnt reality, this is JUST PLAIN BAD. Most of the comments are negative on here for a reason, so dont pretend to be a know-it-all and simply express an opinion. Thats all.

      Reply
  6. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  7. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  8. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  9. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  10. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  11. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  12. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  13. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  14. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  15. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  16. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  17. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  18. All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.

    Reply
  19. seriously! ir you’re going to hire Kate Moss and photo shop her….. you could hire any other model and pay much less!! ’cause for paying kate moss and doing this to her is like A TOTAL WASTE! I don’t get it at all……….. and if you ‘re not talking money, then this is an awfull editorial any ways! it is jst nonsense!! I agree with almost everyone above

    Reply
  20. what a waste of time, no creativity or edge to this shoot whatsoever. Compare this ru~’#sh to the La Perla S/S 2010 campaign with Guinevere VAN SEENUS and then you know what has gone wrong. Guinevere rocks lingerie, Kate sadly lost it a long time ago, let’s say circa CK/Marky Mark days!

    Reply
  21. what a waste of time, no creativity or edge to this shoot whatsoever. Compare this ru~’#sh to the La Perla S/S 2010 campaign with Guinevere VAN SEENUS and then you know what has gone wrong. Guinevere rocks lingerie, Kate sadly lost it a long time ago, let’s say circa CK/Marky Mark days!

    Reply

Leave a Comment