Connect
To Top

Stephanie Seymour & Sons Pose in Photo Shoot for Harper’s Bazaar

Mum’s the Word–Supermodel Stephanie Seymour and her sons, Peter Brant Jr. and Harry Brant, pose together for the March issue of Harper’s Bazaar US. While the Brant brothers are known for their street style, we think Stephanie (who can also be seen in the recent Katie Grand Loves Hogan lookbook) is the center of attention for this shoot wearing standout looks in all black from the likes of Versace, Dolce & Gabbana and Tom Ford styled by Joanna Hillman and photographed by Sebastian Faena. / Set design by Jesse Kaufmann @ Frank Reps









Shop New Styles

25 Comments

  1. Fiona Lynn

    February 12, 2014 at 9:01 pm

    Those are her sons? It seems like they are her lovers! I’m grossed out. Those poor young men.

    • Gar

      February 13, 2014 at 3:15 am

      “Those poor young men.”

      They aren’t forced to do anything they don’t want to.

      • Ang

        February 13, 2014 at 5:29 pm

        One never knows!

        • Anon YMouse

          February 17, 2014 at 4:53 am

          One never knows if they might be lizard men hiding in human bodies, but I won’t go claiming that on internet websites.

  2. Fiona Lynn

    February 12, 2014 at 9:05 pm

    Normally, mothers and sons don’t kiss and fondle each other on the beach. Those pictures of mother and sons doesn’t look very maternal to me. I’m sorry if I offend you. If these guys weren’t her sons, no big deal. BUT THEY ARE HER SONS, and it’s incestuous looking.

    • Anon YMouse

      February 13, 2014 at 3:16 am

      Who cares if it’s “incestuous looking”? What are you, a Bible-thumper? Then you should know that there was plenty of incest in the Bible too….

      • Jasminenlace

        February 14, 2014 at 11:35 am

        What does the bible have to do with the comments??? Has nothing to do with incest being completely wrong and disgusting as are these photos.
        All these pictures all have sexual undertones. All I need to know about them is that they are her sons and she’s posing in a sexual manner with them. Gross. Please don’t have kids if you plan on being a bad mom. Too many people do!

        • Anon YMouse

          February 15, 2014 at 8:40 am

          What makes sexual things wrong unless you’re a Bible-thumper?

          • Anon

            February 22, 2014 at 5:12 pm

            Because even without your very poor trolling and sad argument, scientifically incest specifically when it includes offspring leads to an increase of complications. Charles II of Spain is a prime example of this. Additionally depending on when the incestuous relationship started, who is involved, the age difference it can be a form of abuse, and rape. However I understand you’re simply a troll who gets a kick out of this and will never take away anything. Sad.

          • Anon YMouse

            February 23, 2014 at 2:00 am

            You are hilarious. You don’t even know the definition of the word “incest”. Try again, troll.

            Who is the one trolling again? Not me. Yes, you are very sad at your supposed troll.

            I was obviously not talking about child molestation / rape. Where I live, the men in the picture are not included in that argument.

            What two consenting adults do is their business.

      • A. K. Genova

        May 7, 2014 at 8:35 pm

        Is incest ok then?

        • Anon YMouse

          May 8, 2014 at 11:15 am

          There’s absolutely no reason to say no, especially if no babies are made.

  3. kevin Golike

    February 12, 2014 at 10:09 pm

    this looks more like promotion of insestual relations and is certianly baazar to know this is mother and sons.

    • Anon YMouse

      February 15, 2014 at 8:38 am

      Who cares if it’s “incestuous looking”? What are you, a Bible-thumper? Then you should know that there was plenty of incest in the Bible too….

  4. Deanna Hopper

    February 13, 2014 at 1:06 am

    This photo shoot is totally disgusting!! What the hell is the matter with this mother? If this was a nobody photo shoot – “Child Services” would be involved! This borderlines child pornography. Especially the pictures of her and her son’s on the beach. It’s pure filth!! Not art!!

    • melissa

      February 14, 2014 at 4:24 am

      these are only pictures and nothing else

    • Anon YMouse

      February 15, 2014 at 8:39 am

      How the hell does this borderline on child pornography? Do you understand what that means?

  5. Guest

    February 14, 2014 at 3:32 am

    This is wrong….Gross.

  6. melissa

    February 14, 2014 at 4:23 am

    cant see what the fuss is all about these r only pictures

  7. Solcitohhh

    February 23, 2014 at 3:30 am

    don’t care what theyre doing, she will be always a beautiful supermodel

  8. Paris

    March 11, 2014 at 9:21 pm

    I knew I couldn’t have been the only one who was confused! I’m flipping through my copy of Bazaar and had a WTF moment. Why is her son unzipping her dress while she looks at the other as if she could gobble him up??…VERY weird

  9. A. K. Genova

    May 7, 2014 at 8:33 pm

    Disgusting, call social services.

  10. anonymous

    May 7, 2014 at 8:39 pm

    I’m done with Harper’s; it’s gone bizarrely inappropriate.

  11. Artist

    February 7, 2015 at 8:34 am

    It’s not just pictures!! Images are very powerful and it promotes incest and sex!!! Young impressionable look at these magazines and speaks volumes of our society. It’s just wrong!!!

  12. Caireann

    April 1, 2015 at 12:27 pm

    Disgusting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

More in 2014