Connect
To Top

Portrait | Jacqueline Oloniceva by Michael Donovan

Jacqueline Oloniceva lets loose in Michael Donovan’s energetic portrait series.












18 Comments

  1. Guest

    December 20, 2010 at 8:12 pm

    LOVE this model.

    • Emma

      December 20, 2010 at 8:21 pm

      me too, it’s so emotive

      17andalwaysdreaming.blogspot.com

  2. Hamish scot-tbrown

    December 20, 2010 at 8:47 pm

    Fabulous moody black and white series – full of movement and elegance

  3. Anita Siraki

    December 20, 2010 at 9:27 pm

    love this spread! and the model is fantastic!

    http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/

  4. Anita Siraki

    December 20, 2010 at 9:27 pm

    love this spread! and the model is fantastic!

    http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/

  5. Jess Howard

    December 21, 2010 at 11:43 am

    ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS!… she is amazing and photography is just perfect.

    http://evol-jj.blogspot.com/

  6. Anonymous

    December 21, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    WOWOWOW. This is perfection. So much emotion & range. That photo where she’s crying is literally screaming at you. You can actually feel her pain.

    Just incredible.

    • New Decent

      December 26, 2010 at 11:53 pm

      No. This looks bratty and non-aesthetic. Grace, beauty, etc, should be higher priorities than emotional self-expression if fashion and style are the general purposes. Emotion can be wonderful, but it can also be self-indulgent.

      • Anonymous

        December 27, 2010 at 2:03 pm

        “NO”? What do you mean “NO”?

        Its called an opinion, and dont try to sell yours as a fact.

      • Anonymous

        December 27, 2010 at 2:03 pm

        “NO”? What do you mean “NO”?

        Its called an opinion, and dont try to sell yours as a fact.

        • New Decent

          December 28, 2010 at 4:37 pm

          I said no because you were wrong on two points of fact: the photo where she’s crying did not literally scream at me, and I did not “actually feel her pain.”

          Setting aside your factual error and turning to opinion, do you disagree with the idea that it is self-indulgent, in a fashion context, to prioritize emotional self-expression over grace and beauty?

          • Anonymous

            December 28, 2010 at 6:08 pm

            I am wrong on MY OPINIONS? Sure sure….

            I wont even justify my OPINIONS any further with you.

            By the same token, get over yourself, you sound like a pretentious ass.

  7. New Decent

    December 28, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.

  8. New Decent

    December 28, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.

  9. New Decent

    December 28, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.

  10. Graham

    January 2, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    Also this is a portrait series, so it’s about her, right? Her attitude is part of her style in this.

  11. Karked

    January 24, 2011 at 9:21 am

    Nose?????

  12. Karked

    January 24, 2011 at 9:21 am

    Nose?????

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

More in 2010