Connect
To Top

Fresh Face | Sophie Edenhoeg by Henrik Adamsen

Photographed by Henrik Adamsen, model newcomer Sophie Edenhoeg gets romantic for one of her first editorial works. With the aide of stylist Sarah Paaschburg, Adamsen captures as Sophie spends a day of relaxation and cozying up to that special boy in her life played by fellow 2pm model Christopher Sylvest.






46 Comments

  1. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    April 13, 2010 at 6:11 pm

    She's so unbelievably beautiful.

  2. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    April 13, 2010 at 6:11 pm

    She's so unbelievably beautiful.

  3. the-curious-observer

    April 13, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    she is but this is a terrible editorial

  4. the-curious-observer

    April 13, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    she is but this is a terrible editorial

  5. wondering

    April 13, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    I looove the shoes in the photo where she is laying on the couch.. Anyone who knows who made them?

  6. wondering

    April 13, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    I looove the shoes in the photo where she is laying on the couch.. Anyone who knows who made them?

  7. Levis

    April 13, 2010 at 7:16 pm

    She's very beautiful, yes. But it's sad she looks so angry in every picture.

  8. Levis

    April 13, 2010 at 7:16 pm

    She's very beautiful, yes. But it's sad she looks so angry in every picture.

  9. susanlindemann

    April 13, 2010 at 7:20 pm

    Beautiful story

  10. susanlindemann

    April 13, 2010 at 7:20 pm

    Beautiful story

  11. gabriela

    April 13, 2010 at 7:33 pm

    she's really beautiful, but she had the same expression in every picture.

  12. gabriela

    April 13, 2010 at 7:33 pm

    she's really beautiful, but she had the same expression in every picture.

  13. Turkey Burger

    April 13, 2010 at 7:55 pm

    amazing

  14. Turkey Burger

    April 13, 2010 at 7:55 pm

    amazing

  15. Jamie

    April 13, 2010 at 8:54 pm

    Pretty good for one of her first editorials. People can be so critical.

    • susanlindemann

      April 13, 2010 at 9:21 pm

      My thought exactly. Besides – lots of models get by on pretty much one look. Freja Beha for example

      • Beatrice

        April 14, 2010 at 4:41 am

        I disagree with that comment about Freja Beha. Her recent editorial work ('In Grande Stile' with Meisel, the close-up shots with Emma Summerton, 'NY, NY 10021' with Inez and Vinoodh, 'Tango' by Karl Lagerfeld) and runway performance (opening and closing Oscar de la Renta!) shows that she can easily model outside of 'one look'.

        But I do agree that there are some models who basically recycle one look over and over again. It's just a matter of how appealing it is in the long run. Although newcomer Sophie is pretty, her irritated expression isn't.

        It's a good first try nevertheless. Wishing her all the best!

  16. Jamie

    April 13, 2010 at 8:54 pm

    Pretty good for one of her first editorials. People can be so critical.

    • susanlindemann

      April 13, 2010 at 9:21 pm

      My thought exactly. Besides – lots of models get by on pretty much one look. Freja Beha for example

      • Beatrice

        April 14, 2010 at 4:41 am

        I disagree with that comment about Freja Beha. Her recent editorial work ('In Grande Stile' with Meisel, the close-up shots with Emma Summerton, 'NY, NY 10021' with Inez and Vinoodh, 'Tango' by Karl Lagerfeld) and runway performance (opening and closing Oscar de la Renta!) shows that she can easily model outside of 'one look'.

        But I do agree that there are some models who basically recycle one look over and over again. It's just a matter of how appealing it is in the long run. Although newcomer Sophie is pretty, her irritated expression isn't.

        It's a good first try nevertheless. Wishing her all the best!

  17. Lesco

    April 13, 2010 at 11:47 pm

    This is out of order. Regardless of how beautiful she comes across, she is a child. The theme of this shoot is strongly suggesting under-age sex and is only going to fuel the already "Sky-high" single mum population. Aren't there enough models to do this job? Henrik Adamsen is obiously into something that isn't good for anyone. Those who dissagree should also take stock.

    • Jamie

      April 14, 2010 at 12:40 am

      Are you serious? They are just laying in bed together and the boy doesn't look that much older himself. I could see if she was naked or wearing lingerie, but come on.

      • ani

        April 14, 2010 at 1:24 am

        First and fourth pictures that include the male model are suggestive of a mature relationship. Which when coupled with images of them on the bed assumes a sexual relationship. Sorry but the coding is right. These pictures contain subtle sexual messages, regardless of how young or innocent they look.

        • Big

          April 14, 2010 at 4:35 am

          "These pictures contain subtle sexual messages" <—-you are a bit of a jack-ass. It is fashion not a lesson on ethics or morality for fuck-sake.

          • ani

            April 14, 2010 at 2:00 pm

            I never made any comments on ethics or morality. Personally I find her beautiful and the editorial is okay.. I've seen better. But the pictures do contain sexual messages, denying it won't make it go away, neither will calling anyone a jack-ass change anything. Be polite.

          • FASHIONOGRAPHY

            April 14, 2010 at 8:12 pm

            You're really naive and brainwashed.

    • FASHIONOGRAPHY

      April 14, 2010 at 6:27 am

      Let's dismantle this a bit, shall we? What is a model's job? Beyond selling clothes and products, one job of a model is to act. She is 14 and she is obviously role-playing the part of what is maybe an older teenage girl. Thus the theme of this shoot is suitable. The only thing that her age prevents her from doing is something that she is not doing anyway – posing nude. I agree with 'Big.' This is fashion, not a lesson in ethics or morality. Get the fuck over it.

      • Big

        April 14, 2010 at 6:38 pm

        :-)

        • K.D.

          April 16, 2010 at 3:37 am

          yes let us posit that she is merely a model and not a real person who is being told to act outside (hopefully) her experience and age range. No need to go dropping the f bomb, we can all politely agree that some of us have higher standards for the industry than others.

  18. Lesco

    April 13, 2010 at 11:47 pm

    This is out of order. Regardless of how beautiful she comes across, she is a child. The theme of this shoot is strongly suggesting under-age sex and is only going to fuel the already "Sky-high" single mum population. Aren't there enough models to do this job? Henrik Adamsen is obiously into something that isn't good for anyone. Those who dissagree should also take stock.

    • Jamie

      April 14, 2010 at 12:40 am

      Are you serious? They are just laying in bed together and the boy doesn't look that much older himself. I could see if she was naked or wearing lingerie, but come on.

      • ani

        April 14, 2010 at 1:24 am

        First and fourth pictures that include the male model are suggestive of a mature relationship. Which when coupled with images of them on the bed assumes a sexual relationship. Sorry but the coding is right. These pictures contain subtle sexual messages, regardless of how young or innocent they look.

        • Big

          April 14, 2010 at 4:35 am

          "These pictures contain subtle sexual messages" <—-you are a bit of a jack-ass. It is fashion not a lesson on ethics or morality for fuck-sake.

          • ani

            April 14, 2010 at 2:00 pm

            I never made any comments on ethics or morality. Personally I find her beautiful and the editorial is okay.. I've seen better. But the pictures do contain sexual messages, denying it won't make it go away, neither will calling anyone a jack-ass change anything. Be polite.

          • FASHIONOGRAPHY

            April 14, 2010 at 8:12 pm

            You're really naive and brainwashed.

    • FASHIONOGRAPHY

      April 14, 2010 at 6:27 am

      Let's dismantle this a bit, shall we? What is a model's job? Beyond selling clothes and products, one job of a model is to act. She is 14 and she is obviously role-playing the part of what is maybe an older teenage girl. Thus the theme of this shoot is suitable. The only thing that her age prevents her from doing is something that she is not doing anyway – posing nude. I agree with 'Big.' This is fashion, not a lesson in ethics or morality. Get the fuck over it.

      • Big

        April 14, 2010 at 6:38 pm

        :-)

        • K.D.

          April 16, 2010 at 3:37 am

          yes let us posit that she is merely a model and not a real person who is being told to act outside (hopefully) her experience and age range. No need to go dropping the f bomb, we can all politely agree that some of us have higher standards for the industry than others.

  19. @dbp_

    April 14, 2010 at 3:24 am

    beautiful yet bad posing… Here head looks like it might pop off!

  20. @dbp_

    April 14, 2010 at 3:24 am

    beautiful yet bad posing… Here head looks like it might pop off!

  21. carly

    April 14, 2010 at 4:00 am

    crazy beautiful
    hard to believe shes only 14

  22. carly

    April 13, 2010 at 9:00 pm

    crazy beautiful
    hard to believe shes only 14

  23. @CecilieNH

    April 14, 2010 at 7:41 am

    I simply look at these images and find them beautiful. Period. Gorgous girl no matter how old she is, and I think on the topic of if this is sexual or not – the eye sees what the eye wants to see. I don't see anything sexual here. I'm in love with this editorial!

  24. @CecilieNH

    April 14, 2010 at 7:41 am

    I simply look at these images and find them beautiful. Period. Gorgous girl no matter how old she is, and I think on the topic of if this is sexual or not – the eye sees what the eye wants to see. I don't see anything sexual here. I'm in love with this editorial!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

More in Editorial