Connect
To Top

Armani S/S ’10 Campaign | Megan Fox by Mert & Marcus

Actress Megan Fox replaces Victoria Beckham for the latest campaigns from Emporio Armani and Armani Jeans. Photographed by Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott in Los Angeles, Armani goes for a minimal campaign this time around. Appearing in his own campaign separate from Fox will be athlete Cristiano Ronaldo.


Source | WWD

Shop New Styles

69 Comments

  1. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    January 12, 2010 at 7:53 am

    It was a bad idea replacing Victoria Beckham. Megan Fox doesn't compare.
    If they were going to replace Victoria, they should've inquired with other models instead.

    • jess

      January 12, 2010 at 11:05 am

      i agree with you, she is beautiful , is hot in this moment but victoria is ubber next to her.

    • jess

      January 12, 2010 at 11:05 am

      i agree with you, she is beautiful , is hot in this moment but victoria is ubber next to her.

    • jess

      January 12, 2010 at 11:05 am

      i agree with you, she is beautiful , is hot in this moment but victoria is ubber next to her.

    • eddie

      January 12, 2010 at 3:45 pm

      she is much better han Victoria, shut up.

    • eddie

      January 12, 2010 at 3:45 pm

      she is much better han Victoria, shut up.

    • eddie

      January 12, 2010 at 3:45 pm

      she is much better han Victoria, shut up.

    • benjamin

      January 13, 2010 at 12:18 am

      you're right they don't compare.
      victoria beckham is a horrible ugly mole and megan is a FOX.

    • benjamin

      January 13, 2010 at 12:18 am

      you're right they don't compare.
      victoria beckham is a horrible ugly mole and megan is a FOX.

    • benjamin

      January 13, 2010 at 12:18 am

      you're right they don't compare.
      victoria beckham is a horrible ugly mole and megan is a FOX.

    • Linzi

      January 13, 2010 at 2:32 pm

      Those ads are so airbrushed…you can see where they went in and took away from her hips. looks too fake.

    • Linzi

      January 13, 2010 at 2:32 pm

      Those ads are so airbrushed…you can see where they went in and took away from her hips. looks too fake.

    • Linzi

      January 13, 2010 at 2:32 pm

      Those ads are so airbrushed…you can see where they went in and took away from her hips. looks too fake.

  2. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    January 12, 2010 at 7:53 am

    It was a bad idea replacing Victoria Beckham. Megan Fox doesn't compare.
    If they were going to replace Victoria, they should've inquired with other models instead.

  3. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    January 12, 2010 at 7:53 am

    It was a bad idea replacing Victoria Beckham. Megan Fox doesn't compare.
    If they were going to replace Victoria, they should've inquired with other models instead.

  4. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    January 12, 2010 at 7:53 am

    It was a bad idea replacing Victoria Beckham. Megan Fox doesn't compare.
    If they were going to replace Victoria, they should've inquired with other models instead.

    • jess

      January 12, 2010 at 11:05 am

      i agree with you, she is beautiful , is hot in this moment but victoria is ubber next to her.

    • eddie

      January 12, 2010 at 3:45 pm

      she is much better han Victoria, shut up.

    • benjamin

      January 13, 2010 at 12:18 am

      you're right they don't compare.
      victoria beckham is a horrible ugly mole and megan is a FOX.

    • Linzi

      January 13, 2010 at 2:32 pm

      Those ads are so airbrushed…you can see where they went in and took away from her hips. looks too fake.

  5. vicki lee

    January 12, 2010 at 9:07 am

    I disagree with FASHIONOGRAPHY. I think Megan Fox is great; all men and women think she's hot and she's gorgeous here!
    Megan Fox is different to Victoria Beckham, but good different. She's more curvy and gorgous. Victoria Beckham is more modelesque.
    I think these shots are great.

    • FASHIONOGRAPHY

      January 12, 2010 at 10:19 am

      Right. Because Armani campaigns are about the curvy and not the modelesque…

    • FASHIONOGRAPHY

      January 12, 2010 at 10:19 am

      Right. Because Armani campaigns are about the curvy and not the modelesque…

    • FASHIONOGRAPHY

      January 12, 2010 at 10:19 am

      Right. Because Armani campaigns are about the curvy and not the modelesque…

  6. vicki lee

    January 12, 2010 at 9:07 am

    I disagree with FASHIONOGRAPHY. I think Megan Fox is great; all men and women think she's hot and she's gorgeous here!
    Megan Fox is different to Victoria Beckham, but good different. She's more curvy and gorgous. Victoria Beckham is more modelesque.
    I think these shots are great.

  7. vicki lee

    January 12, 2010 at 9:07 am

    I disagree with FASHIONOGRAPHY. I think Megan Fox is great; all men and women think she's hot and she's gorgeous here!
    Megan Fox is different to Victoria Beckham, but good different. She's more curvy and gorgous. Victoria Beckham is more modelesque.
    I think these shots are great.

  8. vicki lee

    January 12, 2010 at 9:07 am

    I disagree with FASHIONOGRAPHY. I think Megan Fox is great; all men and women think she's hot and she's gorgeous here!
    Megan Fox is different to Victoria Beckham, but good different. She's more curvy and gorgous. Victoria Beckham is more modelesque.
    I think these shots are great.

    • FASHIONOGRAPHY

      January 12, 2010 at 10:19 am

      Right. Because Armani campaigns are about the curvy and not the modelesque…

  9. Szymon

    January 12, 2010 at 10:23 am

    nice stuff :)

  10. Szymon

    January 12, 2010 at 10:23 am

    nice stuff :)

  11. Szymon

    January 12, 2010 at 10:23 am

    nice stuff :)

  12. cocamia

    January 12, 2010 at 11:05 am

    Wow! I am a little surprised!

  13. cocamia

    January 12, 2010 at 11:05 am

    Wow! I am a little surprised!

  14. cocamia

    January 12, 2010 at 11:05 am

    Wow! I am a little surprised!

  15. cocamia

    January 12, 2010 at 11:05 am

    Wow! I am a little surprised!

  16. Unfunded

    January 12, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    She looks amazing. They styled her perfectly – not too done up and tranny, you know? This is perfection.

  17. Unfunded

    January 12, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    She looks amazing. They styled her perfectly – not too done up and tranny, you know? This is perfection.

  18. Unfunded

    January 12, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    She looks amazing. They styled her perfectly – not too done up and tranny, you know? This is perfection.

  19. Unfunded

    January 12, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    She looks amazing. They styled her perfectly – not too done up and tranny, you know? This is perfection.

  20. Mari

    January 12, 2010 at 8:13 pm

    Love this, this is simple and sensual. Just the way it should be.

  21. Mari

    January 12, 2010 at 8:13 pm

    Love this, this is simple and sensual. Just the way it should be.

  22. Mari

    January 12, 2010 at 8:13 pm

    Love this, this is simple and sensual. Just the way it should be.

  23. Mari

    January 12, 2010 at 8:13 pm

    Love this, this is simple and sensual. Just the way it should be.

  24. jessie

    January 12, 2010 at 11:10 pm

    absolutely gorgeous

  25. jessie

    January 12, 2010 at 11:10 pm

    absolutely gorgeous

  26. jessie

    January 12, 2010 at 11:10 pm

    absolutely gorgeous

  27. jessie

    January 12, 2010 at 11:10 pm

    absolutely gorgeous

  28. iris

    January 12, 2010 at 11:33 pm

    she is really hot

  29. iris

    January 12, 2010 at 11:33 pm

    she is really hot

  30. iris

    January 12, 2010 at 11:33 pm

    she is really hot

  31. iris

    January 12, 2010 at 11:33 pm

    she is really hot

  32. Jessica

    January 13, 2010 at 3:16 am

    she doesn't have the seductive edge in these shots, but she's hot…
    victoria did it for me, megan not so much

  33. Jessica

    January 13, 2010 at 3:16 am

    she doesn't have the seductive edge in these shots, but she's hot…
    victoria did it for me, megan not so much

  34. Jessica

    January 13, 2010 at 3:16 am

    she doesn't have the seductive edge in these shots, but she's hot…
    victoria did it for me, megan not so much

  35. Jessica

    January 13, 2010 at 3:16 am

    she doesn't have the seductive edge in these shots, but she's hot…
    victoria did it for me, megan not so much

  36. Mauri

    January 13, 2010 at 11:32 am

    she looks great in this campaign

  37. Mauri

    January 13, 2010 at 11:32 am

    she looks great in this campaign

  38. Mauri

    January 13, 2010 at 11:32 am

    she looks great in this campaign

  39. Mauri

    January 13, 2010 at 11:32 am

    she looks great in this campaign

  40. whoever

    January 15, 2010 at 7:38 am

    too airbrushed….which is annoying because megan is naturally hot anyway

  41. whoever

    January 15, 2010 at 7:38 am

    too airbrushed….which is annoying because megan is naturally hot anyway

  42. whoever

    January 15, 2010 at 7:38 am

    too airbrushed….which is annoying because megan is naturally hot anyway

  43. whoever

    January 15, 2010 at 7:38 am

    too airbrushed….which is annoying because megan is naturally hot anyway

  44. son

    February 19, 2010 at 5:48 am

    i prefer VICTORIA BECKHAM than megan… VICTORIA BECKHAM such better…go victoria…victoria….

  45. son

    February 19, 2010 at 5:48 am

    i prefer VICTORIA BECKHAM than megan… VICTORIA BECKHAM such better…go victoria…victoria….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

More in Uncategorized