Alessandra Ambrosio by Matthias Vriens-McGrath for Numéro Tokyo January/February 2011

alessandra ambrosio6 Alessandra Ambrosio by Matthias Vriens McGrath for <em>Numéro Tokyo</em> January/February 2011

In front of Matthias Vriens-McGrath’s lens, Alessandra Ambrosio unleashes her inner vixen for the January issue of Numéro Tokyo. Starring alongside to studly males, Alessandra takes on strong and sexy looks from the likes of Dior, Chanel and Michael Kors styled by Masha Orlov. / Casting & Production by Andrey T. for MVM Studio

alessandra ambrosio1 Alessandra Ambrosio by Matthias Vriens McGrath for <em>Numéro Tokyo</em> January/February 2011
alessandra ambrosio2 Alessandra Ambrosio by Matthias Vriens McGrath for <em>Numéro Tokyo</em> January/February 2011
alessandra ambrosio3 Alessandra Ambrosio by Matthias Vriens McGrath for <em>Numéro Tokyo</em> January/February 2011
alessandra ambrosio4 Alessandra Ambrosio by Matthias Vriens McGrath for <em>Numéro Tokyo</em> January/February 2011
alessandra ambrosio5 Alessandra Ambrosio by Matthias Vriens McGrath for <em>Numéro Tokyo</em> January/February 2011
alessandra ambrosio7 Alessandra Ambrosio by Matthias Vriens McGrath for <em>Numéro Tokyo</em> January/February 2011


  • Anonymous

    She is sooooooooo scary looking. One of those faces that cannot carry all that make up, otherwise, “hello hot tranny mess”!!

    That first photo, it looks like she has NO arms, only numbs. Its so freaky. What a bad bad bad editorial.

  • Anonymous

    Love Alessandra, great beauty, but this doesn’t work for me for some reason.

  • Karen

    i dislike alessandra in editorials

  • http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/ Anita Siraki

    i totally thought she hand no arms in the first photo! and i want the no eyebrows look to STOP!!!! it doesn’t look good! especially with someone like alessandra and her strong features!…the man candy is nice though :)

    http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/

    • http://aggieschmaggie.blogspot.com Aggie

      Me too! I was wondering where her ams disappeared to.

  • lizzie

    i was totally confused by the first photo too. she needs her eyebrows back. there’s just no getting around it

  • Dave

    i don’t like the makeup work, especially around the cheeks and mouth. it almost makes her look like a completely different person.

  • anonymous

    Terrifying. She looks really rough.

  • Anonymous

    This absolutely horrifying. Her harsh features cannot carry that much makeup. Makes her look like a tranny.

  • http://twitter.com/lovelaceluxe Love, Lace, Luxe

    I hate the makeup in this! Her face looks way to thin too…

    http://www.lovelaceluxe.com

  • Liz

    Her features are too masculine to carry that much harsh make-up; it only emphasizes it in the most awful way imaginable.

  • guest

    cant’t watch this ..A go away!!!

  • http://twitter.com/edufracked Mel Couteau

    Two faces: sexy mouth open and sexy mouth closed.

  • Karolina

    I like her face less and less….

  • Anon

    o ho ho! This arrogant ‘model’ is annoying. Keep your slut drawl on the VS runway where it belongs!
    *loving* the male models though. Yum.

  • http://www.lilacsaloon.com Megan V

    It seems like she is “over modeling” in all of these photos. Right?? And where did her eyebrows go? Creepy!

  • http://shouldshebuysomenailpolish.blogspot.com ELOUISE

    ahha Im sure this will be on the list ´’ugliest editorial this month’

  • Honeypot119

    I mean this editorial is really offensive not only because the model is cheap as chips, but in the 5th pic, we don’t need a white woman holding a necklace around a black model’s neck like an animal. When is the fashion world going to wake up to this racist imagery!

    • http://nudecency.tumblr.com New Decent

      It’s interesting how nobody else bothered to point that out. As for your question about the future I think it’s rational to expect that fashion will as always follow, not lead, changes in real (economic, military, territorial, etc) power. Obama’s pretentious post-racial hype does not qualify.

  • Mrtrillianpink

    This is startlingly racist. How is this allowed in an reputable publication?

  • Spotmag

    come on… is good to see that she can do a different sexy. she is not pretty in this work and is all I love about it…
    http://www.spotmag.blogspot.com

  • Carol

    I agree spotmag! and also, poeple from the fashion industrie love her more and more!!! I love to see her in this high fahshion editorials, not just the comercial stuff, once we already know that she is gourgeous ans super sexy!!

  • Anonymous

    her sharp features CANNOT carry that much makeup. Its just not an option for her.

  • Hnghfvv

    I’ll take a sex bomb model like her anyday over some bloated egg head chipmunk looking model. they need to go away ASAP.

  • kkyle

    i agree, it doesn’t work for me either, i don’t think the makeup artist made best work of her features… she is gorgeous, but her face isn’t working for me here.