Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published March 20, 2011

Screen siren Scarlett Johansson dons a wardrobe of all Dolce & Gabbana attire for the April edition of Vogue China. Lensed by Peter Lindbergh and styled by Nicoletta Santoro, Scarlett is ever the picture of a blonde bombshell in the black and white portraits.





source | push @ TFS


Recent Updates

Toni Garrn Hunza G Swim Featured

Toni Garrn is Coastal Chic in Hunza G’s New Swimwear

Toni Garrn is welcoming the arrival of summer in Hunza G's latest swimwear collection. Known for its signature crinkle fabric, ...
Massimo Dutti Red Fashion Featured

Massimo Dutti Harnesses the Power of Red Fashion for Summer

Massimo Dutti's recent spring-summer 2024 lookbook, Rouge O'Clock, envelops the viewer in striking red hues against the pristine sands of ...
Sydney Sweeney May 2024 Style

Sydney Sweeney’s Style: From the Met Gala to Denim

Sydney Sweeney has been turning heads with her fashion choices recently. At the 2024 Met Gala in New York City ...
Juliette Lewis Warby Parker Featured

Juliette Lewis Rocks Warby Parker’s Summer 2024 Eyewear

Warby Parker's summer 2024 collection captures the essence of dreamy, retro-inspired glamour with a range of vibrant eyewear designs. Actress ...
Kate Moss Anine Bing Featured

Kate Moss Makes Her Return for Anine Bing Summer 2024 Ad

In the summer 2024 campaign for Anine Bing, fashion icon Kate Moss teams up with the brand once again, bringing ...
Gucci Bloom Fragrance Featured

Gucci Bloom’s Perfume Ad is a Garden Dreamland

Gucci unveils a stunning new campaign highlighting versions of the Gucci Bloom floral fragrance. Shot by Harley Weir, models Diane ...

32 thoughts on “Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011”

  1. What i like about her is that shes kept her beautiful womanly body. It’s perfect. Unlike some stars (ehem Amanda Seyfried) that lose so much weight under pressure. Idk, Johanna is just refreshing.

    Reply
  2. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
  3. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
  4. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  5. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  6. i know she stirs up mixed reviews, and personally i’m not terribly enamoured with her, but this is a really beautiful set of photographs.

    Reply
  7. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply
  8. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Mara Cancel reply