Vogue Paris May 2010 Cover | Penelope, Naomi, Gwyneth, Meryl, Julianne & Kate by Inez & Vinoodh

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published April 16, 2010

source | Dieselmax @ tfs


Recent Updates

Jennie Chanel Premiere Edition Watch Featured

Jennie Captivates in Chanel Première Édition Watch Ad

Jennie from Blackpink is again captivating audiences in her latest project with Chanel. In this fresh campaign, she poses with ...
Bulgari Eyewear Spring 2024 Featured

Bulgari Eyewear Spring 2024: Vittoria Ceretti Stands Out

In a recent unveiling, Bulgari introduced its spring 2024 collection of eyewear and accessories, spotlighting brand ambassador Vittoria Ceretti. Inspired ...
Alexander McQueen Fall 2024 Featured

Alexander McQueen Fall 2024: A New Chapter

Alexander McQueen's fall-winter 2024 collection marks Seán McGirr's debut as the new creative director. This collection is a bold departure ...
Kendall Jenner Tommy Hilfiger Spring 2024 Featured

Kendall Jenner Brings LA Glam to Tommy Hilfiger’s Spring Ads

Kendall Jenner has taken the fashion world by storm once again, becoming the face of Tommy Hilfiger's spring 2024 campaign ...
How to Wear Denim Jacket Featured

How to Wear a Denim Jacket in 2024: Trendy Outfit Ideas

Denim jackets are the timeless wardrobe staple that seamlessly blends comfort with style. Knowing how to wear a denim jacket ...
Sabrina Idris Elba Calvin Klein Eternity Featured

Sabrina & Idris Elba Wow for Calvin Klein Eternity Ad

Calvin Klein has introduced a fresh chapter in the legacy of its renowned fragrance, Eternity, with the announcement of Idris ...

22 thoughts on “Vogue Paris May 2010 Cover | Penelope, Naomi, Gwyneth, Meryl, Julianne & Kate by Inez & Vinoodh”

  1. woow overphotoshopped to the point that it's almost impossible to identify who's who….
    – wow, julianne moore's head is just a bit unproportionally large in comparison to her body
    – where the f is lily d? i see just one blonde who slightly resembles her
    —–> EPIC FAIL

    Reply
    • it's not necessarily photoshopped, alot of the time a photographer will light the talent in a particular way that hides imperfections. A large reason they might look similar is because they all have eye make-up on that is the same. stress less dom

      Reply
  2. woow overphotoshopped to the point that it's almost impossible to identify who's who….
    – wow, julianne moore's head is just a bit unproportionally large in comparison to her body
    – where the f is lily d? i see just one blonde who slightly resembles her
    —–> EPIC FAIL

    Reply
    • it's not necessarily photoshopped, alot of the time a photographer will light the talent in a particular way that hides imperfections. A large reason they might look similar is because they all have eye make-up on that is the same. stress less dom

      Reply
  3. this is really a shame, this is a group of unique and beautiful women who span decades in age so why does merely look as old as julienne??!?!?! why can't we (as a society/world) embrace age as a beautiful and diversifying attribute like race or sex? why must all these women be digitally made to look virtually the same age when in fact there is probably 30 years between some of them (if not more)….now a lot has happned in those 30 years, why not celebrate it..life!!??

    -lady danger forhttp://www.improperopera.com/

    Reply
  4. this is really a shame, this is a group of unique and beautiful women who span decades in age so why does merely look as old as julienne??!?!?! why can't we (as a society/world) embrace age as a beautiful and diversifying attribute like race or sex? why must all these women be digitally made to look virtually the same age when in fact there is probably 30 years between some of them (if not more)….now a lot has happned in those 30 years, why not celebrate it..life!!??

    -lady danger forhttp://www.improperopera.com/

    Reply
  5. Kate, Meryl and Penelope look gorgeous. Everyone elses face just looks a little distorted. Julianne Moore just looks creepy- she's definitely photoshopped. Like the idea of having all these wonderful ladies on the cover, however, I wish would have gone for a more natural look.

    Reply
  6. Kate, Meryl and Penelope look gorgeous. Everyone elses face just looks a little distorted. Julianne Moore just looks creepy- she's definitely photoshopped. Like the idea of having all these wonderful ladies on the cover, however, I wish would have gone for a more natural look.

    Reply
  7. Wow. There are so many haters. I think this cover and the other two that Penelope produced are fabulous. ALL fashion images are retouched. The fact that these are well know actresses may make them look "strange" to people who are used to seeing models on covers who appear perfect when in fact they are just as photoshopped. Some of the women look "distorted" in this photo due to the camera angle and lens used by Inez & Vinoodh to create depth of field. It would be terribly boring to see the same standard work over and over again. This is a breath of fresh air in my opinion. Let's also not forget the important reason these covers were created for a great cause – to promote Bono's (Red) campaign.
    http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com

    Reply
  8. Wow. There are so many haters. I think this cover and the other two that Penelope produced are fabulous. ALL fashion images are retouched. The fact that these are well know actresses may make them look "strange" to people who are used to seeing models on covers who appear perfect when in fact they are just as photoshopped. Some of the women look "distorted" in this photo due to the camera angle and lens used by Inez & Vinoodh to create depth of field. It would be terribly boring to see the same standard work over and over again. This is a breath of fresh air in my opinion. Let's also not forget the important reason these covers were created for a great cause – to promote Bono's (Red) campaign.
    http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com

    Reply
  9. yikes, i'm not being a hater, i honestly do not like this cover. they are over photoshopped, they all look the same age and frankly, i just don't find it interesting. if i was at the newstand this wouldn't catch my eye at all. #fail

    Reply
  10. yikes, i'm not being a hater, i honestly do not like this cover. they are over photoshopped, they all look the same age and frankly, i just don't find it interesting. if i was at the newstand this wouldn't catch my eye at all. #fail

    Reply
  11. Hey, compared to that ridiculous American Vogue cover that featured some of these celebrities on, photoshopped in red dresses on a beach, this is pure amazement. Just think of that.

    Reply
  12. Hey, compared to that ridiculous American Vogue cover that featured some of these celebrities on, photoshopped in red dresses on a beach, this is pure amazement. Just think of that.

    Reply

Leave a Comment