Bregje Heinen by Signe Vilstrup in L’idole Éternelle | Tush Spring 2010

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published May 7, 2010

Photographer Signe Vilstrup takes the meaning of the word statuesque to a whole other level for the latest issue of Tush, as he captures Bregje Heinen looking absolutely stunning in L’idole Eternelle. Styled by Wiebke Bredehorst, the model dons ensembles from Versace, D&G, Dior and others as she poses alongside her sculpted companions.













source | helligirl @ tfs


Recent Updates

Emily Ratajkowski's Tory Burch Ad Has That Summer Feeling

Emily Ratajkowski’s Tory Burch Ad Has That Summer Feeling

Tory Burch and Emily Ratajkowski reunite for an impressive summer 2024 campaign, showcasing the brand's limited-edition Ice Cream Shop collection ...
How to Remove Makeup Featured

How to Remove Makeup: Skincare Tips for A Fresh Face

After a full day of glam, learning how to remove makeup effectively is essential for maintaining healthy skin and preventing ...
Selena Gomez Time Magazine Featured

Selena Gomez Looks Like a Painting in Time Magazine

Selena Gomez graces the cover of TIME Magazine's June 10th, 2024 issue with an undeniable presence. Photographed by Elliot & ...
Cara Delevingne Calvin Klein Pride Featured

Cara Delevingne Brings Pride Energy to Calvin Klein Ad

Calvin Klein is celebrating Pride with the 2024 "This Is Love" campaign featuring supermodel Cara Delevingne. The British beauty shines ...
How to Accessorize Featured

How to Accessorize Your Outfits for Every Occasion

Knowing how to accessorize goes beyond wearing different pieces together. It involves a strategic choice of items that enhance your ...
Louis Vuitton LV Pool 2024 Featured

Louis Vuitton Chases the Sun with LV by Pool Collection

Louis Vuitton introduces its latest LV by The Pool collection for 2024, capturing the essence of summer with a luxurious ...

91 thoughts on “Bregje Heinen by Signe Vilstrup in L’idole Éternelle | Tush Spring 2010”

  1. I hope she really isnt just 16, as according to NY Mag's model manual. :S
    Gorgeous photos nontheless.

      • Because all 16 year-olds should have a such an exposed, superficial image of what success is, huh?

      • Because all 16 year-olds should have a such an exposed, superficial image of what success is, huh?

        • 16 year olds are allowed to work as other 16 year olds are and in whatever they are talented at and enjoy.
          However with the nudity in the 5th, I don't think she is 16. Or at least I would hope not!

        • 16 year olds are allowed to work as other 16 year olds are and in whatever they are talented at and enjoy.
          However with the nudity in the 5th, I don't think she is 16. Or at least I would hope not!

        • 16 year olds are allowed to work as other 16 year olds are and in whatever they are talented at and enjoy.
          However with the nudity in the 5th, I don't think she is 16. Or at least I would hope not!

        • 16 year olds are allowed to work as other 16 year olds are and in whatever they are talented at and enjoy.
          However with the nudity in the 5th, I don't think she is 16. Or at least I would hope not!

        • That's exactly right. How about you open up your mind to the fact that where you live is not the only piece of land on this planet? People are brought up and raised into different societies and cultures. Not everyone is so intolerant.

          • By what fucking standard, moron? This is a creative industry. Not to mention that nudity laws are different everywhere you go. Europe is much more lenient and receptive to it.

          • By what fucking standard, moron? This is a creative industry. Not to mention that nudity laws are different everywhere you go. Europe is much more lenient and receptive to it.

        • That's exactly right. How about you open up your mind to the fact that where you live is not the only piece of land on this planet? People are brought up and raised into different societies and cultures. Not everyone is so intolerant.

  2. I hope she really isnt just 16, as according to NY Mag's model manual. :S
    Gorgeous photos nontheless.

      • Because all 16 year-olds should have a such an exposed, superficial image of what success is, huh?

        • 16 year olds are allowed to work as other 16 year olds are and in whatever they are talented at and enjoy.
          However with the nudity in the 5th, I don't think she is 16. Or at least I would hope not!

        • 16 year olds are allowed to work as other 16 year olds are and in whatever they are talented at and enjoy.
          However with the nudity in the 5th, I don't think she is 16. Or at least I would hope not!

        • That's exactly right. How about you open up your mind to the fact that where you live is not the only piece of land on this planet? People are brought up and raised into different societies and cultures. Not everyone is so intolerant.

          • By what fucking standard, moron? This is a creative industry. Not to mention that nudity laws are different everywhere you go. Europe is much more lenient and receptive to it.

  3. the body is a beautiful thing, when is she supposed to show it off when she's 50 and wrinkly? because that's the only time it will be accepted and she wont have to worry about her parents seeing it?

  4. the body is a beautiful thing, when is she supposed to show it off when she's 50 and wrinkly? because that's the only time it will be accepted and she wont have to worry about her parents seeing it?

  5. if people are offended about nudity in fashion they shouldn’t be near or viewing these natural talent and aesthetics in art and fashion! They are just plain stupid narrow minded people nothing better to do!!!

    • The objection is not to nudity, I appreciate nudity. I think the female body is beautiful, I don't think however, that girls who are 16 should be exploited in such a way.

      • Exactly what about this is exploitative? It's not like she's shooting a porno…these are soft, tasteful images. Nothing about this suggests to me that she was mistreated or coerced in any way.

      • Exactly what about this is exploitative? It's not like she's shooting a porno…these are soft, tasteful images. Nothing about this suggests to me that she was mistreated or coerced in any way.

        • K.D. – you're a dolt. There is no exploitation here as 'banana' explained. I think something all opposed are forgetting too is the fact that this is IMPLIED. Get over it and appreciate it for what it is or you can opt to x out the page.

          • Everybody has their own opinion and is entitled to express it. But there's no need to call someone who is respectfully expressing their opinion a "dolt" just because you disagree with them.

          • Everybody has their own opinion and is entitled to express it. But there's no need to call someone who is respectfully expressing their opinion a "dolt" just because you disagree with them.

        • K.D. – you're a dolt. There is no exploitation here as 'banana' explained. I think something all opposed are forgetting too is the fact that this is IMPLIED. Get over it and appreciate it for what it is or you can opt to x out the page.

    • The objection is not to nudity, I appreciate nudity. I think the female body is beautiful, I don't think however, that girls who are 16 should be exploited in such a way.

  6. if people are offended about nudity in fashion they shouldn’t be near or viewing these natural talent and aesthetics in art and fashion! They are just plain stupid narrow minded people nothing better to do!!!

  7. if people are offended about nudity in fashion they shouldn’t be near or viewing these natural talent and aesthetics in art and fashion! They are just plain stupid narrow minded people nothing better to do!!!

    • The objection is not to nudity, I appreciate nudity. I think the female body is beautiful, I don't think however, that girls who are 16 should be exploited in such a way.

      • Exactly what about this is exploitative? It's not like she's shooting a porno…these are soft, tasteful images. Nothing about this suggests to me that she was mistreated or coerced in any way.

        • K.D. – you're a dolt. There is no exploitation here as 'banana' explained. I think something all opposed are forgetting too is the fact that this is IMPLIED. Get over it and appreciate it for what it is or you can opt to x out the page.

          • Everybody has their own opinion and is entitled to express it. But there's no need to call someone who is respectfully expressing their opinion a "dolt" just because you disagree with them.

  8. she IS 16 or 17 or whatever, BUT she is NOT exploited!!!! She is doing this because she WANTS TO! she models because she wants to , because shes good at it and she can and she can make a lot of money to do it. Girls who go into modeling KNOW what they are getting into, and agencies ALWAYS ask what they are and are not comfortable doing. Coco Rocha said she will never pose nude or topless and she hasn't. Its the same argument as with Terry Richardson, people who say he forces girls to do things they dont want to do, when you know you are going to have a shoot with Terry you KNOW you will be doing something sexual, it is your CHOICE whether or not you decide to go in or not, whether you will regret it later that's another cup of tea, but there should not even be a question of exploitation.

  9. she IS 16 or 17 or whatever, BUT she is NOT exploited!!!! She is doing this because she WANTS TO! she models because she wants to , because shes good at it and she can and she can make a lot of money to do it. Girls who go into modeling KNOW what they are getting into, and agencies ALWAYS ask what they are and are not comfortable doing. Coco Rocha said she will never pose nude or topless and she hasn't. Its the same argument as with Terry Richardson, people who say he forces girls to do things they dont want to do, when you know you are going to have a shoot with Terry you KNOW you will be doing something sexual, it is your CHOICE whether or not you decide to go in or not, whether you will regret it later that's another cup of tea, but there should not even be a question of exploitation.

  10. she IS 16 or 17 or whatever, BUT she is NOT exploited!!!! She is doing this because she WANTS TO! she models because she wants to , because shes good at it and she can and she can make a lot of money to do it. Girls who go into modeling KNOW what they are getting into, and agencies ALWAYS ask what they are and are not comfortable doing. Coco Rocha said she will never pose nude or topless and she hasn't. Its the same argument as with Terry Richardson, people who say he forces girls to do things they dont want to do, when you know you are going to have a shoot with Terry you KNOW you will be doing something sexual, it is your CHOICE whether or not you decide to go in or not, whether you will regret it later that's another cup of tea, but there should not even be a question of exploitation.

  11. Regardless of the age drama folks (in America!)… she was shot in Europe where she was OF AGE for photos… as are the laws of the land.

    The laws apply to where the model is standing, not where the viewer is sitting.

    And besides… GET OVER IT!!!

  12. Regardless of the age drama folks (in America!)… she was shot in Europe where she was OF AGE for photos… as are the laws of the land.

    The laws apply to where the model is standing, not where the viewer is sitting.

    And besides… GET OVER IT!!!

  13. Regardless of the age drama folks (in America!)… she was shot in Europe where she was OF AGE for photos… as are the laws of the land.

    The laws apply to where the model is standing, not where the viewer is sitting.

    And besides… GET OVER IT!!!

Comments are closed.