edie is such a 60’s beauty, reminds me of both edie sedgwick and twiggy for some reason. i would love to see her much more often in the nearest future
@ hivenn. why does there have to be a lot of portraits? you should look through Tim Barber’s work. He isn’t like most, (or really any) other fashion photographers in his approach to creating successful images. The environment plays a huge role in his fashion work. it’s just as important as the clothing itself.
She looks great here cause the looks really suit her but I find her very unidimensional…
The setting is so good, but I don’t care too much for the model. She’s pretty, but not especially interesting.
Comments are closed.
To best optimize our website for visitors, we use cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to the use of cookies.
This is nice. I love how natural it is.
amazing portrait quality with natural settings and great girl. well done!
I’m not sure why there aren’t more close ups, she’s a stunner
see the whole story here : http://www.tim-barber.com/albums/sweet-jane-for-muse
edie is such a 60’s beauty, reminds me of both edie sedgwick and twiggy for some reason. i would love to see her much more often in the nearest future
@ hivenn. why does there have to be a lot of portraits? you should look through Tim Barber’s work. He isn’t like most, (or really any) other fashion photographers in his approach to creating successful images. The environment plays a huge role in his fashion work. it’s just as important as the clothing itself.
She looks great here cause the looks really suit her but I find her very unidimensional…
The setting is so good, but I don’t care too much for the model. She’s pretty, but not especially interesting.