Dangerous Luxury – Raquel Zimmermann takes part in a hotel affair with Ben Hill for the fall 2011 campaign from Jimmy Choo. Lensed by Steven Meisel, Raquel is sexy yet sophisticated in the shoe wear advertisements. (Vogue Italia)
Raquel Zimmermann for Jimmy Choo Fall 2011 Campaign by Steven Meisel
Recent Updates
Chloé Pre-Fall 2024: A Love Letter to the 70s
Chloé’s pre-fall 2024 collection, aptly named "The Beginning," harks back to the iconic stylings of Karl Lagerfeld's 1970s work, bringing ...
Y2K Fashion Outfits: Nail the Aesthetic & Trends
Y2K fashion reflects a unique style that emerged in the late '90s and early 2000s. This aesthetic is characterized by ...
Jennie & Gentle Monster’s New Eyewear Collab is Beyond Chic
Gentle Monster and Jennie from Blackpink join forces once again for their 'Jentle Salon' collaboration. The third collaboration between the ...
Alo Yoga Aces the Style Game with Tennis Club Capsule
In the sun-drenched courts of chic and leisure, Alo Yoga unveils its Tennis Club collection, a tasteful nod to the ...
Kim Kardashian Sets Summer on Fire in SKIMS 2024 Swimwear
Kim Kardashian, the reality TV star turned business mogul, is once again commanding attention with her latest SKIMS Swim 2024 ...
Ferragamo Pre-Fall 2024: Get Lost in the Fashion Fantasy
Ferragamo's pre-fall 2024 campaign fuses art, history, and fashion captured through the lens of Harley Weir. In a striking juxtaposition, ...
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Agreed. The preview image does not sit well with me.
Normally I don’t cry sexism, but I agree… That first shot before the cut really rubs me the wrong way, sadly.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
it looks vell nice and we all like it Ralph Lauren
Polos Short Sleeve Men’s dress shirts are
accessible Shop Cheap Jimmy Choo bags