Connect
To Top

Vilma, Dempsey & Stephanie by Karen Inderbitzen-Waller for No. Magazine

Karen Inderbitzen-Waller captures two of Australia’s fresh faces, Dempsey Stewart and Stephanie Cherry, for the latest issue of No. Magazine. Joined by Lithuanian model Vilma Putriute, the trio takes to the great outdoors in the relaxed stylings of Zara Mirkin. / Lighting & digital by Delphine Avril Planqueel













Shop New Styles

16 Comments

  1. Anita Siraki

    December 7, 2010 at 6:49 pm

    i love this! the monochromatic looks with a bit of prints is really lovely
    http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/

  2. Denise_bodden

    December 7, 2010 at 6:51 pm

    wow i love the models and the styling…very niceee!!

    http://deniseandthegang.blogspot.com/

  3. Dalton Louis Photography

    December 7, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    I love the photography and I love, love, love the styling. But I hate the fact that these girls look like their 12. Sorry, but they just seem too young for this.

    • Dave

      December 7, 2010 at 8:33 pm

      Are you sure the soft lighting and makeup aren’t playing tricks on your eyes? None of them look under 17 to me.

      • Dalton Louis Photography

        December 7, 2010 at 9:15 pm

        Maybe it’s my age and the fact that I’m a parent, so that I’m a bit more sensitive to it. And lol, 17 is still very young to me! But also artistically, I just think it work better with more womanly models, than girlish ones. But that’s just mho… They’re still beautiful photos.

  4. Sebastian Kubatz Photography

    December 7, 2010 at 8:30 pm

    lovely photography

    😉

    new PICS every monday… follow:
    http://blog.sebastiankubatz.de

    cheers,
    sebastian

  5. Glorified G

    December 7, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    I can understand, that the meaning of fashion photography is not to show the world as it is, but this one is quite grotesque. In a bad meaning. The girls look very, very young. Much too young for that styling. I’d never buy anything, that is worn by a 12 year old. IMO shot in a foot

    • anonymous

      December 7, 2010 at 10:37 pm

      What about this is grotesque? I just cannot grasp what you mean.

    • Fashion Gone Rogue

      December 8, 2010 at 5:56 am

      There are so many things wrong with this comment…

      • Anon

        December 8, 2010 at 3:28 pm

        I agree with Glorifed on this one. The styling is far too mature for the models. Fail!!

    • Fashion Gone Rogue

      December 8, 2010 at 5:56 am

      There are so many things wrong with this comment…

  6. anonymous

    December 7, 2010 at 10:36 pm

    I like that they seem younger, it’s very virgin suicides-y.

    • Anonymous

      December 8, 2010 at 9:46 am

      Agree.

  7. Sasha Pok

    December 8, 2010 at 10:04 am

    ?????? ! 10 ??? ?????? ! ! !

  8. Nichy

    December 10, 2010 at 4:51 am

    Beautiful :)

    But Vilma is definitely 18 not 12.

  9. bisr

    December 31, 2010 at 5:48 am

    Vilma is 18 or, I met her she is no babe in the woods, and I am sure all the girls loved the clothes and would have loved to have kept them all – you guys are bleating about nonsense.
    In any case this is much better than the usual NO. editorial – it feels beautiful and coherent (even if it is stealing a little too much from LULA), good simple palette, actually decent compositions from K-I-W and the softness really is right for the clothes. Best styling in NO ever I think, what a breath of fresh air it’s not all grunge things are actually allowed to be worn the right way (I have no problem with stylists f-king stuff up but it is too obvious in NO as ZM always does it). The only problem, really, is the grade (i.e. colour & tone processing/correction). Nothing has been done to maximise the feel of the shots, direction, etc – it is just left too muddy and I bit it printed horribly on the stock NO uses. Why not just take it a little bit further, maximize the potential, it’s so easy to do Camilla Akrans does it all the time. Watch a little Garden of the Finzi-Continis even… push it a bit further, take the images to their fullness.
    Oh wait, NO. doesn’t like that, do they? This is what happens when editors get dogmatic about what “their magazine” is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in 2010