Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published March 20, 2011

Screen siren Scarlett Johansson dons a wardrobe of all Dolce & Gabbana attire for the April edition of Vogue China. Lensed by Peter Lindbergh and styled by Nicoletta Santoro, Scarlett is ever the picture of a blonde bombshell in the black and white portraits.





source | push @ TFS


Recent Updates

Leighton Meester St John

Leighton Meester Shines in St. John & Edie Parker Collab

Leighton Meester resurrects the charm of her Gossip Girl character in the recent collaboration between St. John and Edie Parker ...
Zara SRPLS Spring 2024

Zara SRPLS Spring 2024: Utilitarian Style Made Chic

In the spring-summer 2024 unveiling of Zara's SRPLS CLLCTN 12, the mood is one of sophisticated ease, bridging the gap ...
Gisele Bundchen Vivara Jewelry Mothers Day

Gisele Bundchen is Ethereal in Vivara’s Mother’s Day Ad

Gisele Bundchen shines in Vivara's Mother's Day campaign for 2024, celebrating the unspoken bond of motherhood. The Brazilian supermodel and ...
How Smell Good Featured

How to Smell Good All Day: A Guide to Personal Freshness

Knowing the subtle art of how to smell good extends beyond mere fragrance application. It involves a detailed routine with ...
Victorias Swim Summer 2024

Gigi Hadid Wows in Victoria’s Secret Swim 2024 Ad

Victoria's Secret has unveiled its highly anticipated swimsuit campaign for summer 2024, bringing back the vibrant styles of the '90s ...
Sofia Richie Stuart Weitzman 2024

Sofia Richie Brings Maternity Style to Stuart Weitzman Ad

Sofia Richie, in a fusion of personal milestones and fashion, debuts as the new brand ambassador of Stuart Weitzman. Gracing ...

32 thoughts on “Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011”

  1. What i like about her is that shes kept her beautiful womanly body. It’s perfect. Unlike some stars (ehem Amanda Seyfried) that lose so much weight under pressure. Idk, Johanna is just refreshing.

    Reply
  2. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
  3. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
  4. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  5. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  6. i know she stirs up mixed reviews, and personally i’m not terribly enamoured with her, but this is a really beautiful set of photographs.

    Reply
  7. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply
  8. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Perezg Cancel reply