Dangerous Luxury – Raquel Zimmermann takes part in a hotel affair with Ben Hill for the fall 2011 campaign from Jimmy Choo. Lensed by Steven Meisel, Raquel is sexy yet sophisticated in the shoe wear advertisements. (Vogue Italia)
Raquel Zimmermann for Jimmy Choo Fall 2011 Campaign by Steven Meisel
Recent Updates
Gigi Hadid Wows in Victoria’s Secret Swim 2024 Ad
Victoria's Secret has unveiled its highly anticipated swimsuit campaign for summer 2024, bringing back the vibrant styles of the '90s ...
Sofia Richie Brings Maternity Style to Stuart Weitzman Ad
Sofia Richie, in a fusion of personal milestones and fashion, debuts as the new brand ambassador of Stuart Weitzman. Gracing ...
Persol N1: Chiara Scelsi Wears Classic Eyewear Styles
Persol's latest N1 campaign presents an elegant vision of design and artisanship through a monochromatic lens. With Italian model Chiara ...
Beach Wedding Attire: Your Guide to the Perfect Guest Look
Selecting the right beach wedding attire is a challenging task that balances fashion with the unique charm of a seaside ...
Louis Vuitton Flight Mode Summer 2024: Travel in Luxury
Louis Vuitton goes on a journey of fashion-forward travel by unveiling its Flight Mode collection for summer 2024. Celebrating the ...
Civil War Star Kirsten Dunst Takes the Spotlight for Flaunt
Kirsten Dunst graces the cover of Flaunt Magazine's Issue 191 with an unmistakable aura of confidence. Photographed by David Roemer ...
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Agreed. The preview image does not sit well with me.
Normally I don’t cry sexism, but I agree… That first shot before the cut really rubs me the wrong way, sadly.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
it looks vell nice and we all like it Ralph Lauren
Polos Short Sleeve Men’s dress shirts are
accessible Shop Cheap Jimmy Choo bags