Dangerous Luxury – Raquel Zimmermann takes part in a hotel affair with Ben Hill for the fall 2011 campaign from Jimmy Choo. Lensed by Steven Meisel, Raquel is sexy yet sophisticated in the shoe wear advertisements. (Vogue Italia)
Raquel Zimmermann for Jimmy Choo Fall 2011 Campaign by Steven Meisel
Recent Updates
Leighton Meester Shines in St. John & Edie Parker Collab
Leighton Meester resurrects the charm of her Gossip Girl character in the recent collaboration between St. John and Edie Parker ...
Zara SRPLS Spring 2024: Utilitarian Style Made Chic
In the spring-summer 2024 unveiling of Zara's SRPLS CLLCTN 12, the mood is one of sophisticated ease, bridging the gap ...
Gisele Bundchen is Ethereal in Vivara’s Mother’s Day Ad
Gisele Bundchen shines in Vivara's Mother's Day campaign for 2024, celebrating the unspoken bond of motherhood. The Brazilian supermodel and ...
How to Smell Good All Day: A Guide to Personal Freshness
Knowing the subtle art of how to smell good extends beyond mere fragrance application. It involves a detailed routine with ...
Gigi Hadid Wows in Victoria’s Secret Swim 2024 Ad
Victoria's Secret has unveiled its highly anticipated swimsuit campaign for summer 2024, bringing back the vibrant styles of the '90s ...
Sofia Richie Brings Maternity Style to Stuart Weitzman Ad
Sofia Richie, in a fusion of personal milestones and fashion, debuts as the new brand ambassador of Stuart Weitzman. Gracing ...
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Agreed. The preview image does not sit well with me.
Normally I don’t cry sexism, but I agree… That first shot before the cut really rubs me the wrong way, sadly.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
it looks vell nice and we all like it Ralph Lauren
Polos Short Sleeve Men’s dress shirts are
accessible Shop Cheap Jimmy Choo bags