Jacqueline Oloniceva lets loose in Michael Donovan’s energetic portrait series.
Portrait | Jacqueline Oloniceva by Michael Donovan
Recent Updates
Sara Sampaio Dives Into Hunkemoller’s New Swim Ad
The famed Portuguese model Sara Sampaio is the epitome of summer radiance in Hunkemöller's 2024 Own Your Glow swimsuit campaign ...
Polo Ralph Lauren Spring 2024: Bright Colors & Relaxed Fits
Polo Ralph Lauren has unveiled its spring 2024 campaign, aptly named Only Polo, showcasing a collection that celebrates vibrant, joyful ...
Kate Upton Lights Up Anne Klein Spring 2024 Ad
Kate Upton captures the essence of contemporary femininity in Anne Klein's spring-summer 2024 campaign, delivering an array of looks that ...
Summer Nail Designs: Ideas to Obsess Over in 2024
Warm weather is perfect for experimenting with bold, vibrant, and whimsical summer nail designs. From psychedelic swirls on stiletto shapes ...
Exclusive: Alina & Jette by Carmelo Donato in ‘Denim Remixed’
In a striking fashion feature captured by Carmelo Donato, FGR's latest exclusive focuses on denim, with models Alina Enders and ...
Logan Hollowell’s Silk Collection Delivers Goddess Glam
Logan Hollowell, known for its fine jewelry, ventures into ready-to-wear with the debut of its Silk Collection. The 100% silk ...
LOVE this model.
me too, it’s so emotive
17andalwaysdreaming.blogspot.com
Fabulous moody black and white series – full of movement and elegance
love this spread! and the model is fantastic!
http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/
love this spread! and the model is fantastic!
http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/
ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS!… she is amazing and photography is just perfect.
http://evol-jj.blogspot.com/
WOWOWOW. This is perfection. So much emotion & range. That photo where she’s crying is literally screaming at you. You can actually feel her pain.
Just incredible.
No. This looks bratty and non-aesthetic. Grace, beauty, etc, should be higher priorities than emotional self-expression if fashion and style are the general purposes. Emotion can be wonderful, but it can also be self-indulgent.
“NO”? What do you mean “NO”?
Its called an opinion, and dont try to sell yours as a fact.
“NO”? What do you mean “NO”?
Its called an opinion, and dont try to sell yours as a fact.
I said no because you were wrong on two points of fact: the photo where she’s crying did not literally scream at me, and I did not “actually feel her pain.”
Setting aside your factual error and turning to opinion, do you disagree with the idea that it is self-indulgent, in a fashion context, to prioritize emotional self-expression over grace and beauty?
I am wrong on MY OPINIONS? Sure sure….
I wont even justify my OPINIONS any further with you.
By the same token, get over yourself, you sound like a pretentious ass.
Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.
Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.
Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.
Also this is a portrait series, so it’s about her, right? Her attitude is part of her style in this.
Nose?????
Nose?????