Jacqueline Oloniceva lets loose in Michael Donovan’s energetic portrait series.
Portrait | Jacqueline Oloniceva by Michael Donovan
Recent Updates
Leighton Meester Shines in St. John & Edie Parker Collab
Leighton Meester resurrects the charm of her Gossip Girl character in the recent collaboration between St. John and Edie Parker ...
Zara SRPLS Spring 2024: Utilitarian Style Made Chic
In the spring-summer 2024 unveiling of Zara's SRPLS CLLCTN 12, the mood is one of sophisticated ease, bridging the gap ...
Gisele Bundchen is Ethereal in Vivara’s Mother’s Day Ad
Gisele Bundchen shines in Vivara's Mother's Day campaign for 2024, celebrating the unspoken bond of motherhood. The Brazilian supermodel and ...
How to Smell Good All Day: A Guide to Personal Freshness
Knowing the subtle art of how to smell good extends beyond mere fragrance application. It involves a detailed routine with ...
Gigi Hadid Wows in Victoria’s Secret Swim 2024 Ad
Victoria's Secret has unveiled its highly anticipated swimsuit campaign for summer 2024, bringing back the vibrant styles of the '90s ...
Sofia Richie Brings Maternity Style to Stuart Weitzman Ad
Sofia Richie, in a fusion of personal milestones and fashion, debuts as the new brand ambassador of Stuart Weitzman. Gracing ...
LOVE this model.
me too, it’s so emotive
17andalwaysdreaming.blogspot.com
Fabulous moody black and white series – full of movement and elegance
love this spread! and the model is fantastic!
http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/
love this spread! and the model is fantastic!
http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/
ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS!… she is amazing and photography is just perfect.
http://evol-jj.blogspot.com/
WOWOWOW. This is perfection. So much emotion & range. That photo where she’s crying is literally screaming at you. You can actually feel her pain.
Just incredible.
No. This looks bratty and non-aesthetic. Grace, beauty, etc, should be higher priorities than emotional self-expression if fashion and style are the general purposes. Emotion can be wonderful, but it can also be self-indulgent.
“NO”? What do you mean “NO”?
Its called an opinion, and dont try to sell yours as a fact.
“NO”? What do you mean “NO”?
Its called an opinion, and dont try to sell yours as a fact.
I said no because you were wrong on two points of fact: the photo where she’s crying did not literally scream at me, and I did not “actually feel her pain.”
Setting aside your factual error and turning to opinion, do you disagree with the idea that it is self-indulgent, in a fashion context, to prioritize emotional self-expression over grace and beauty?
I am wrong on MY OPINIONS? Sure sure….
I wont even justify my OPINIONS any further with you.
By the same token, get over yourself, you sound like a pretentious ass.
Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.
Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.
Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.
Also this is a portrait series, so it’s about her, right? Her attitude is part of her style in this.
Nose?????
Nose?????