Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published April 26, 2010

The Block shows us Marilyn Agency‘s most promising fresh faces with a dark and macabre spread published in their spring issue. Photographed by Louis Christopher, Kristina Krivomazova, Hannah Johnson, Josefin Hedstrom, Tetyana McInychuk, Yulia Leontieva, Melodie Dagault, Rel Dade, Chantal Stafford Abbott and Thana Kuhnen wear a mix of vintage garments and powerful accessories from the likes of Givenchy, Park Choon Moo and Longchamp styled by James Worthington DeMolet.











Recent Updates

Kate Upton Anne Klein Featured

Kate Upton Lights Up Anne Klein Spring 2024 Ad

Kate Upton captures the essence of contemporary femininity in Anne Klein's spring-summer 2024 campaign, delivering an array of looks that ...
Summer Nail Designs Featured

Summer Nail Designs: Ideas to Obsess Over in 2024

Warm weather is perfect for experimenting with bold, vibrant, and whimsical summer nail designs. From psychedelic swirls on stiletto shapes ...
Denim Story Feature

Exclusive: Alina & Jette by Carmelo Donato in ‘Denim Remixed’

In a striking fashion feature captured by Carmelo Donato, FGR's latest exclusive focuses on denim, with models Alina Enders and ...
Logan Hollowell Silk Collection

Logan Hollowell’s Silk Collection Delivers Goddess Glam

Logan Hollowell, known for its fine jewelry, ventures into ready-to-wear with the debut of its Silk Collection. The 100% silk ...
Ana de Armas Estee Lauder

Ana de Armas is a Vision in Estée Lauder Lipstick Ad

Ana de Armas captivates in Estée Lauder's latest advertisement, embracing the opulent glow of the new Re-Nutriv Diamond Serum Lipcolor ...
Spell Bohemian Royale

Spell’s Bohemian Royale Print Gets an Eco-Chic Makeover

Spell's latest Renew collection marks a decade of the beloved Bohemian Royale print, demonstrating the brand's commitment to sustainable fashion ...

17 thoughts on “Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010”

  1. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  2. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  3. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  4. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply

Leave a Reply to courtenay Cancel reply