Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published April 26, 2010

The Block shows us Marilyn Agency‘s most promising fresh faces with a dark and macabre spread published in their spring issue. Photographed by Louis Christopher, Kristina Krivomazova, Hannah Johnson, Josefin Hedstrom, Tetyana McInychuk, Yulia Leontieva, Melodie Dagault, Rel Dade, Chantal Stafford Abbott and Thana Kuhnen wear a mix of vintage garments and powerful accessories from the likes of Givenchy, Park Choon Moo and Longchamp styled by James Worthington DeMolet.











Recent Updates

Gisele Bundchen Vivara Jewelry Mothers Day

Gisele Bundchen is Ethereal in Vivara’s Mother’s Day Ad

Gisele Bundchen shines in Vivara's Mother's Day campaign for 2024, celebrating the unspoken bond of motherhood. The Brazilian supermodel and ...
How Smell Good Featured

How to Smell Good All Day: A Guide to Personal Freshness

Knowing the subtle art of how to smell good extends beyond mere fragrance application. It involves a detailed routine with ...
Victorias Swim Summer 2024

Gigi Hadid Wows in Victoria’s Secret Swim 2024 Ad

Victoria's Secret has unveiled its highly anticipated swimsuit campaign for summer 2024, bringing back the vibrant styles of the '90s ...
Sofia Richie Stuart Weitzman 2024

Sofia Richie Brings Maternity Style to Stuart Weitzman Ad

Sofia Richie, in a fusion of personal milestones and fashion, debuts as the new brand ambassador of Stuart Weitzman. Gracing ...
Persol Eyewear 2024

Persol N1: Chiara Scelsi Wears Classic Eyewear Styles

Persol's latest N1 campaign presents an elegant vision of design and artisanship through a monochromatic lens. With Italian model Chiara ...
Beach Wedding Attire Featured

Beach Wedding Attire: Your Guide to the Perfect Guest Look

Selecting the right beach wedding attire is a challenging task that balances fashion with the unique charm of a seaside ...

17 thoughts on “Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010”

  1. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  2. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  3. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  4. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply

Leave a Reply to UglyKidJoel Cancel reply