Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published April 26, 2010

The Block shows us Marilyn Agency‘s most promising fresh faces with a dark and macabre spread published in their spring issue. Photographed by Louis Christopher, Kristina Krivomazova, Hannah Johnson, Josefin Hedstrom, Tetyana McInychuk, Yulia Leontieva, Melodie Dagault, Rel Dade, Chantal Stafford Abbott and Thana Kuhnen wear a mix of vintage garments and powerful accessories from the likes of Givenchy, Park Choon Moo and Longchamp styled by James Worthington DeMolet.











Recent Updates

LV Flight Mode

Louis Vuitton Flight Mode Summer 2024: Travel in Luxury

Louis Vuitton goes on a journey of fashion-forward travel by unveiling its Flight Mode collection for summer 2024. Celebrating the ...
kirsten Dunst Featured

Civil War Star Kirsten Dunst Takes the Spotlight for Flaunt

Kirsten Dunst graces the cover of Flaunt Magazine's Issue 191 with an unmistakable aura of confidence. Photographed by David Roemer ...
Mavi Spring 2024 Featured

Mavi Spring 2024 Campaign: Denim with Coastal Vibes

Capturing the essence of Southern California's serene beaches and laid-back vibes, Mavi's spring-summer 2024 campaign highlights new season jeans. Shot ...
Bantu Knot Hairstyles Featured

Bantu Knot Hairstyles: The Top Ideas for 2024

Embracing heritage and modernity, Bantu knot hairstyles offer a bold and versatile way to style natural hair. Bantu knots are ...
Sabrina Carpenter SKIMS Featured

Sabrina Carpenter Channels Retro Style in SKIMS Ad

Sabrina Carpenter steps into the limelight as the new face of SKIMS, highlighting the Stretch Lace and Fits Everybody collections ...
Courreges Spring 2024

Courrèges Spring 2024 Campaign: Floating into the Season

Courrèges introduces its spring-summer 2024 campaign with an ethereal blend of motion and stillness. Photographer David Sims captures the essence ...

17 thoughts on “Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010”

  1. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  2. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  3. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  4. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply

Leave a Reply to lllllhhhhh Cancel reply