Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published March 20, 2011

Screen siren Scarlett Johansson dons a wardrobe of all Dolce & Gabbana attire for the April edition of Vogue China. Lensed by Peter Lindbergh and styled by Nicoletta Santoro, Scarlett is ever the picture of a blonde bombshell in the black and white portraits.





source | push @ TFS


Recent Updates

Jennie Maison Kitsune Featured

Jennie is Pretty in Pastels for Maison Kitsuné Ad

Spring 2024 welcomes Jennie of Blackpink as the new face of Maison Kitsuné's Baby Fox collection. In a laid-back ad ...
Neiman Marcus Spring 2024 Featured

Neiman Marcus Spring 2024 Campaign: Championing Elegance

Neiman Marcus embraces the dynamism of sports and luxury fashion in its "Quest for the Best" spring 2024 campaign, captured ...
Swarovski Spring 2024 Featured

Irina Shayk, Karlie Kloss Bring Mermaidcore to Swarovski Ad

Swarovski takes a deep dive into the mythical with its spring-summer 2024 campaign, channeling the allure of Venus and embracing ...
Oliver Peoples Khaite Spring 2024 Featured

Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024: Crafting Chic Eyewear

The Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024 collection promises an eyewear feast for the fashion-forward. Exemplifying an industrial chic aesthetic, ...
Nina Cosmic Featured

Nina T Gets Interstellar for Numéro Switzerland

In "Cosmic Being," photographed by Ana Abril, a futuristic fashion editorial takes place in Numéro Switzerland's premiere issue. Model Nina ...
Zara Jeans Spring Featured

Zara Jeans Spring 2024: Exploring Casual Styles

The season of renewal brings with it Zara's spring 2024 jeans collection, offering a refreshing take on denim that pays ...

32 thoughts on “Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011”

  1. What i like about her is that shes kept her beautiful womanly body. It’s perfect. Unlike some stars (ehem Amanda Seyfried) that lose so much weight under pressure. Idk, Johanna is just refreshing.

    Reply
  2. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
  3. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
  4. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  5. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  6. i know she stirs up mixed reviews, and personally i’m not terribly enamoured with her, but this is a really beautiful set of photographs.

    Reply
  7. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply
  8. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Catherine Cancel reply