Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published March 20, 2011

Screen siren Scarlett Johansson dons a wardrobe of all Dolce & Gabbana attire for the April edition of Vogue China. Lensed by Peter Lindbergh and styled by Nicoletta Santoro, Scarlett is ever the picture of a blonde bombshell in the black and white portraits.





source | push @ TFS


Recent Updates

Denim Story Feature

Exclusive: Alina & Jette by Carmelo Donato in ‘Denim Remixed’

In a striking fashion feature captured by Carmelo Donato, FGR's latest exclusive focuses on denim, with models Alina Enders and ...
Logan Hollowell Silk Collection

Logan Hollowell’s Silk Collection Delivers Goddess Glam

Logan Hollowell, known for its fine jewelry, ventures into ready-to-wear with the debut of its Silk Collection. The 100% silk ...
Ana de Armas Estee Lauder

Ana de Armas is a Vision in Estée Lauder Lipstick Ad

Ana de Armas captivates in Estée Lauder's latest advertisement, embracing the opulent glow of the new Re-Nutriv Diamond Serum Lipcolor ...
Spell Bohemian Royale

Spell’s Bohemian Royale Print Gets an Eco-Chic Makeover

Spell's latest Renew collection marks a decade of the beloved Bohemian Royale print, demonstrating the brand's commitment to sustainable fashion ...
Kylie Jenner KHY Denim

Kylie Jenner Heats Up Denim With Khy Drop 005 Collection

Khy, the brand driven by Kylie Jenner's fashion instincts, presents its latest creation, Drop 005, a collection focusing on denim ...
Zuhair Murad Bridal Spring 2025

Zuhair Murad Bridal’s Spring 2025 Dresses Are a Must-See

Zuhair Murad's Bridal Spring 2025 collection is a captivating tribute to ancient Phoenician culture, weaving historical opulence with modern bridal ...

32 thoughts on “Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011”

  1. What i like about her is that shes kept her beautiful womanly body. It’s perfect. Unlike some stars (ehem Amanda Seyfried) that lose so much weight under pressure. Idk, Johanna is just refreshing.

    Reply
  2. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
  3. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
  4. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  5. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  6. i know she stirs up mixed reviews, and personally i’m not terribly enamoured with her, but this is a really beautiful set of photographs.

    Reply
  7. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply
  8. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Mara Cancel reply