Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published March 20, 2011

Screen siren Scarlett Johansson dons a wardrobe of all Dolce & Gabbana attire for the April edition of Vogue China. Lensed by Peter Lindbergh and styled by Nicoletta Santoro, Scarlett is ever the picture of a blonde bombshell in the black and white portraits.





source | push @ TFS


Recent Updates

Victorias Swim Summer 2024

Gigi Hadid Wows in Victoria’s Secret Swim 2024 Ad

Victoria's Secret has unveiled its highly anticipated swimsuit campaign for summer 2024, bringing back the vibrant styles of the '90s ...
Sofia Richie Stuart Weitzman 2024

Sofia Richie Brings Maternity Style to Stuart Weitzman Ad

Sofia Richie, in a fusion of personal milestones and fashion, debuts as the new brand ambassador of Stuart Weitzman. Gracing ...
Persol Eyewear 2024

Persol N1: Chiara Scelsi Wears Classic Eyewear Styles

Persol's latest N1 campaign presents an elegant vision of design and artisanship through a monochromatic lens. With Italian model Chiara ...
Beach Wedding Attire Featured

Beach Wedding Attire: Your Guide to the Perfect Guest Look

Selecting the right beach wedding attire is a challenging task that balances fashion with the unique charm of a seaside ...
LV Flight Mode

Louis Vuitton Flight Mode Summer 2024: Travel in Luxury

Louis Vuitton goes on a journey of fashion-forward travel by unveiling its Flight Mode collection for summer 2024. Celebrating the ...
kirsten Dunst Featured

Civil War Star Kirsten Dunst Takes the Spotlight for Flaunt

Kirsten Dunst graces the cover of Flaunt Magazine's Issue 191 with an unmistakable aura of confidence. Photographed by David Roemer ...

32 thoughts on “Scarlett Johansson in Dolce & Gabbana for Vogue China April 2011”

  1. What i like about her is that shes kept her beautiful womanly body. It’s perfect. Unlike some stars (ehem Amanda Seyfried) that lose so much weight under pressure. Idk, Johanna is just refreshing.

    Reply
  2. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • I so agree with you. The whole “REAL WOMAN” gimmick used to sell mags and products drives me crazy. So if I dont have breasts or ass, im not a real woman?

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
    • Agree! I know Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful woman. But shapes are different for everyone. Doesn’t mean people with small breast or thin, skinny is not a real woman. I think the correct term for Scarlett Johansson’s body is “Perfect hourglass shape” and “Her hourglass shape is refreshing”. And I don’t like this editorial very much.

      Reply
  3. That term “Womanly” shape is so f*cking rediculous!!!! A woman should not be defined by her shape. So if your natually skinny, fat, or just ill built does that mean your not womanly??? So being thin, with a little bit of curve is whats womanly. The dumbest sh*t ever!!!

    Reply
  4. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  5. Much better than the actual cover where she looks completely lifeless and bored. Scarlett is a gorgeous girl, and I love all the D&G pieces.

    Reply
  6. i know she stirs up mixed reviews, and personally i’m not terribly enamoured with her, but this is a really beautiful set of photographs.

    Reply
  7. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply
  8. I think she’s not a very good model – she doesn’t seem to know what to do with her body, and the closeups of her face/torso are better, imo, than the full-body shots. Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that she has an amazing figure. Her legs are perfect!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to guest Cancel reply