Portrait | Jacqueline Oloniceva by Michael Donovan

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published December 20, 2010

Jacqueline Oloniceva lets loose in Michael Donovan’s energetic portrait series.













Recent Updates

Jennie Maison Kitsune Featured

Jennie is Pretty in Pastels for Maison Kitsuné Ad

Spring 2024 welcomes Jennie of Blackpink as the new face of Maison Kitsuné's Baby Fox collection. In a laid-back ad ...
Neiman Marcus Spring 2024 Featured

Neiman Marcus Spring 2024 Campaign: Championing Elegance

Neiman Marcus embraces the dynamism of sports and luxury fashion in its "Quest for the Best" spring 2024 campaign, captured ...
Swarovski Spring 2024 Featured

Irina Shayk, Karlie Kloss Bring Mermaidcore to Swarovski Ad

Swarovski takes a deep dive into the mythical with its spring-summer 2024 campaign, channeling the allure of Venus and embracing ...
Oliver Peoples Khaite Spring 2024 Featured

Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024: Crafting Chic Eyewear

The Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024 collection promises an eyewear feast for the fashion-forward. Exemplifying an industrial chic aesthetic, ...
Nina Cosmic Featured

Nina T Gets Interstellar for Numéro Switzerland

In "Cosmic Being," photographed by Ana Abril, a futuristic fashion editorial takes place in Numéro Switzerland's premiere issue. Model Nina ...
Zara Jeans Spring Featured

Zara Jeans Spring 2024: Exploring Casual Styles

The season of renewal brings with it Zara's spring 2024 jeans collection, offering a refreshing take on denim that pays ...

18 thoughts on “Portrait | Jacqueline Oloniceva by Michael Donovan”

  1. WOWOWOW. This is perfection. So much emotion & range. That photo where she’s crying is literally screaming at you. You can actually feel her pain.

    Just incredible.

    Reply
    • No. This looks bratty and non-aesthetic. Grace, beauty, etc, should be higher priorities than emotional self-expression if fashion and style are the general purposes. Emotion can be wonderful, but it can also be self-indulgent.

      Reply
        • I said no because you were wrong on two points of fact: the photo where she’s crying did not literally scream at me, and I did not “actually feel her pain.”

          Setting aside your factual error and turning to opinion, do you disagree with the idea that it is self-indulgent, in a fashion context, to prioritize emotional self-expression over grace and beauty?

          Reply
          • I am wrong on MY OPINIONS? Sure sure….

            I wont even justify my OPINIONS any further with you.

            By the same token, get over yourself, you sound like a pretentious ass.

  2. Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.

    Reply
  3. Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.

    Reply
  4. Emotional self-expression has value in the context of fashion and style only when accompanied by grace and beauty which are the higher priorities. This is not an anti-emotion position, nor even a matter of opinion really. Suppose Jacqueline Oloniceva had been photographed displaying her own innovative engineering blueprints, without grace or beauty and with an unattractive look on her face. That would have little value in the context of fashion and style, not because intellectual matters have no value in fashion but because whatever value they have comes after, not before, the higher priorities of grace and beauty.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Karked Cancel reply