Connect
To Top

Natalie Portman for Vogue US January 2011 by Peter Lindbergh

Black Swan star, Natalie Portman, appears in the January issue of Vogue US for a stunning shoot lensed by Peter Lindbergh. Outfitted by Tonne Goodman, the actress dons sweeping gowns for one ethereal story entitled, Spreading Her Wings.





source | Mirik @ tfs

28 Comments

  1. Anita Siraki

    December 20, 2010 at 12:54 am

  2. maddie

    December 20, 2010 at 12:55 am

    Oh Natalie, how I adore thee.

  3. maddie

    December 20, 2010 at 12:55 am

    Oh Natalie, how I adore thee.

  4. maddie

    December 20, 2010 at 12:55 am

    Oh Natalie, how I adore thee.

  5. Guest

    December 20, 2010 at 1:00 am

    It looks like she’s only got a stump of an arm in the second last photo. Ew, had did this go unnoticed.

  6. Guest

    December 20, 2010 at 1:00 am

    It looks like she’s only got a stump of an arm in the second last photo. Ew, had did this go unnoticed.

  7. Guest

    December 20, 2010 at 1:00 am

    It looks like she’s only got a stump of an arm in the second last photo. Ew, had did this go unnoticed.

  8. Kim

    December 20, 2010 at 1:19 am

    Guh. She is flawless.

  9. anonymous

    December 20, 2010 at 1:48 am

    She is absolutely gorgeous but these are not interesting.

  10. thenyoudie

    December 20, 2010 at 2:40 am

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz………..

  11. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    December 20, 2010 at 3:10 am

    I think that this is, without a doubt, the oldest she’s ever looked in a magazine and unsurprisingly it’s in U.S. Vogue.

  12. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    December 20, 2010 at 3:10 am

    I think that this is, without a doubt, the oldest she’s ever looked in a magazine and unsurprisingly it’s in U.S. Vogue.

  13. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    December 20, 2010 at 3:10 am

    I think that this is, without a doubt, the oldest she’s ever looked in a magazine and unsurprisingly it’s in U.S. Vogue.

  14. angelica

    December 20, 2010 at 7:15 am

    i don’t like her!

  15. Kate

    December 20, 2010 at 7:34 am

    Shes sooo stunning!

  16. Csarky

    December 20, 2010 at 7:52 am

    i love Natalie, but none of these photos except the one selected as the header would be remarkable without the editing. especially the second–wtf?

  17. Style Souk

    December 20, 2010 at 10:33 am

    Natalie is mesmerisingly beautiful… though, unfortunately, these photographs are not.

    http://stylesouk.wordpress.com

  18. Turbo Blanco

    December 20, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    These pictures suck.

  19. Turbo Blanco

    December 20, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    These pictures suck.

  20. Turbo Blanco

    December 20, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    These pictures suck.

  21. Emma

    December 20, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    i not really sure about this..

    17andalwaysdreaming.blogspot.com

  22. baboonbutt

    December 20, 2010 at 4:27 pm

    again, US Vogue’s boringness requirement ruin everything

  23. Jane

    December 20, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    LOVE HER

  24. Ejford90

    December 20, 2010 at 10:49 pm

    Stunning!

    PLEASE follow my blog :)

  25. Ejford90

    December 20, 2010 at 10:49 pm

    Stunning!

    PLEASE follow my blog :)

  26. Anonymous

    December 21, 2010 at 2:11 pm

    Peter Lindbergh is a fantastic photographer… but these are just not that great. US Vogue: *sigh* WHY???

  27. Anonymous

    December 21, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    She looks BORED out of her mind. So is this spread.

  28. New Decent

    December 26, 2010 at 11:30 pm

    The otherwise pointless elevation of Natalie Portman has coincided with, and will probably be remembered in association with, what is hopefully the nadir of Jewish American culture (the ascendancy of pro-Israeli bloodlust, the stench of the association with Dershowitz, etc).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

More in 2010