Megan Fox for Interview June/July 2010 by Craig McDean

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published June 11, 2010

Megan Fox goes high fashion for the June-July cover shoot of Interview Magazine. Photographed by Craig McDean, Megan dons a stern bob as she does a tango with her undressed doppelganger mannequin. Wearing pieces from Lanvin, Calvin Klein, Nina Ricci and others, Fox makes a pretty convincing model in this risqué spread.









Recent Updates

Victorias Swim Summer 2024

Gigi Hadid Wows in Victoria’s Secret Swim 2024 Ad

Victoria's Secret has unveiled its highly anticipated swimsuit campaign for summer 2024, bringing back the vibrant styles of the '90s ...
Sofia Richie Stuart Weitzman 2024

Sofia Richie Brings Maternity Style to Stuart Weitzman Ad

Sofia Richie, in a fusion of personal milestones and fashion, debuts as the new brand ambassador of Stuart Weitzman. Gracing ...
Persol Eyewear 2024

Persol N1: Chiara Scelsi Wears Classic Eyewear Styles

Persol's latest N1 campaign presents an elegant vision of design and artisanship through a monochromatic lens. With Italian model Chiara ...
Beach Wedding Attire Featured

Beach Wedding Attire: Your Guide to the Perfect Guest Look

Selecting the right beach wedding attire is a challenging task that balances fashion with the unique charm of a seaside ...
LV Flight Mode

Louis Vuitton Flight Mode Summer 2024: Travel in Luxury

Louis Vuitton goes on a journey of fashion-forward travel by unveiling its Flight Mode collection for summer 2024. Celebrating the ...
kirsten Dunst Featured

Civil War Star Kirsten Dunst Takes the Spotlight for Flaunt

Kirsten Dunst graces the cover of Flaunt Magazine's Issue 191 with an unmistakable aura of confidence. Photographed by David Roemer ...

139 thoughts on “Megan Fox for Interview June/July 2010 by Craig McDean”

  1. Agreed that it's cold and uninspired. Very stiff (obviously, since she's imitating and alongside a mannequin…). And I have no respect for the eroticism and girl-on-girl innuendo… There's nothing intriguing behind this concept. Fox does have a really great facial structure.

    Reply
  2. Agreed that it's cold and uninspired. Very stiff (obviously, since she's imitating and alongside a mannequin…). And I have no respect for the eroticism and girl-on-girl innuendo… There's nothing intriguing behind this concept. Fox does have a really great facial structure.

    Reply
  3. Agreed that it's cold and uninspired. Very stiff (obviously, since she's imitating and alongside a mannequin…). And I have no respect for the eroticism and girl-on-girl innuendo… There's nothing intriguing behind this concept. Fox does have a really great facial structure.

    Reply
  4. I LOVE IT!!!!! It's wicked how the manequin looks like her. Would be cool if they photoshoped her head onto all of the mannequins.
    Nice ideas. I think it's pretty inspiring and makes you look at it!!! So don' t know what they ^^^^ are moaning about.

    Reply
    • If everyone had the same opinions, life would be stagnant and boring. We all look at things differently and have different taste, so there's no reason to be negative and petty towards those that think differently than you. Especially on something like the review of a fashion editorial.

      Reply
    • If everyone had the same opinions, life would be stagnant and boring. We all look at things differently and have different taste, so there's no reason to be negative and petty towards those that think differently than you. Especially on something like the review of a fashion editorial.

      Reply
  5. I LOVE IT!!!!! It's wicked how the manequin looks like her. Would be cool if they photoshoped her head onto all of the mannequins.
    Nice ideas. I think it's pretty inspiring and makes you look at it!!! So don' t know what they ^^^^ are moaning about.

    Reply
  6. I LOVE IT!!!!! It's wicked how the manequin looks like her. Would be cool if they photoshoped her head onto all of the mannequins.
    Nice ideas. I think it's pretty inspiring and makes you look at it!!! So don' t know what they ^^^^ are moaning about.

    Reply
    • If everyone had the same opinions, life would be stagnant and boring. We all look at things differently and have different taste, so there's no reason to be negative and petty towards those that think differently than you. Especially on something like the review of a fashion editorial.

      Reply
  7. brilliant edit. Megan Fox's expression-less mannequin-like facial expression actually quite fits the whole theme of this editiorail.

    Reply
  8. brilliant edit. Megan Fox's expression-less mannequin-like facial expression actually quite fits the whole theme of this editiorail.

    Reply
  9. brilliant edit. Megan Fox's expression-less mannequin-like facial expression actually quite fits the whole theme of this editiorail.

    Reply
  10. I actually really dig this. Yeah, it is very cold but I think it works perfectly. It's cold, plastic and shallow and it all works perfectly. There's so much hate toward Megan, but I think there is just something really endearing about her (atleast for me personally) and I just think this is an example of how to take a general negative opinion about someone (that she's a cold, shallow, one-look wonder) and work it perfectly.

    Reply
  11. I actually really dig this. Yeah, it is very cold but I think it works perfectly. It's cold, plastic and shallow and it all works perfectly. There's so much hate toward Megan, but I think there is just something really endearing about her (atleast for me personally) and I just think this is an example of how to take a general negative opinion about someone (that she's a cold, shallow, one-look wonder) and work it perfectly.

    Reply
  12. I actually really dig this. Yeah, it is very cold but I think it works perfectly. It's cold, plastic and shallow and it all works perfectly. There's so much hate toward Megan, but I think there is just something really endearing about her (atleast for me personally) and I just think this is an example of how to take a general negative opinion about someone (that she's a cold, shallow, one-look wonder) and work it perfectly.

    Reply
  13. If you're going to Photoshop a face to the extent where the subject looks like plastic, you might as well just shoot mannequins. What's the difference?

    Reply
  14. If you're going to Photoshop a face to the extent where the subject looks like plastic, you might as well just shoot mannequins. What's the difference?

    Reply
  15. If you're going to Photoshop a face to the extent where the subject looks like plastic, you might as well just shoot mannequins. What's the difference?

    Reply
  16. I really like this. I don't like Megan Fox's acting, because, lets face it, there's really hardly any acting involved. Her looks have carried her through in the industry. I think this is a really cool way of hinting at that, although, perhaps it's a bit too blatant to be called hinting. It's cold, yes, but it has to be, that's central to the entire concept. The severe, cold and calculated sexuality of the entire spread is pretty superb.

    Reply
  17. I really like this. I don't like Megan Fox's acting, because, lets face it, there's really hardly any acting involved. Her looks have carried her through in the industry. I think this is a really cool way of hinting at that, although, perhaps it's a bit too blatant to be called hinting. It's cold, yes, but it has to be, that's central to the entire concept. The severe, cold and calculated sexuality of the entire spread is pretty superb.

    Reply
  18. I really like this. I don't like Megan Fox's acting, because, lets face it, there's really hardly any acting involved. Her looks have carried her through in the industry. I think this is a really cool way of hinting at that, although, perhaps it's a bit too blatant to be called hinting. It's cold, yes, but it has to be, that's central to the entire concept. The severe, cold and calculated sexuality of the entire spread is pretty superb.

    Reply
  19. I think Megan´s face might be superimposed in #1 and #4. There´s no way the mannequin looks so much like her. Besides, look at how different that mannequin face is in those two pictures compared to the one in #7… Having said that, I LOVE the concept and that icy mood, in stark contrast to those red glossy lips. McDean provides, as always.

    Reply
  20. I think Megan´s face might be superimposed in #1 and #4. There´s no way the mannequin looks so much like her. Besides, look at how different that mannequin face is in those two pictures compared to the one in #7… Having said that, I LOVE the concept and that icy mood, in stark contrast to those red glossy lips. McDean provides, as always.

    Reply
  21. I think Megan´s face might be superimposed in #1 and #4. There´s no way the mannequin looks so much like her. Besides, look at how different that mannequin face is in those two pictures compared to the one in #7… Having said that, I LOVE the concept and that icy mood, in stark contrast to those red glossy lips. McDean provides, as always.

    Reply
  22. VERY HELMUT NEWTON – he did a shoot with a woman playing with a mannequin mini doll version of herself, and another with sex dolls. Really nice interpretation.

    Reply
  23. VERY HELMUT NEWTON – he did a shoot with a woman playing with a mannequin mini doll version of herself, and another with sex dolls. Really nice interpretation.

    Reply
  24. VERY HELMUT NEWTON – he did a shoot with a woman playing with a mannequin mini doll version of herself, and another with sex dolls. Really nice interpretation.

    Reply
  25. We agree. Original, awesome, provocative!!! Those who wrote "who's the mannequin" got the point totally. In fashion's desire for Stepford perfection, and our American desire to be celeb clones, you get mannequins. This is just a 70s statement made new again. Love it.

    Reply
  26. We agree. Original, awesome, provocative!!! Those who wrote "who's the mannequin" got the point totally. In fashion's desire for Stepford perfection, and our American desire to be celeb clones, you get mannequins. This is just a 70s statement made new again. Love it.

    Reply
  27. We agree. Original, awesome, provocative!!! Those who wrote "who's the mannequin" got the point totally. In fashion's desire for Stepford perfection, and our American desire to be celeb clones, you get mannequins. This is just a 70s statement made new again. Love it.

    Reply
  28. Uninspiring. Not impressed. Her face is stunning, but she doesnt do nothing here for me. Little cheesy with the whole girl-on-girl theme.

    Reply
  29. Uninspiring. Not impressed. Her face is stunning, but she doesnt do nothing here for me. Little cheesy with the whole girl-on-girl theme.

    Reply
  30. Uninspiring. Not impressed. Her face is stunning, but she doesnt do nothing here for me. Little cheesy with the whole girl-on-girl theme.

    Reply
  31. the idea of model & mannequin was done before, with eniko mihalik in vogue paris. while i think this is great (though i'm no fan of megan fox), the sterility of the photos cannot compare to the sensuality & warmth of the vogue ones.

    Reply
  32. the idea of model & mannequin was done before, with eniko mihalik in vogue paris. while i think this is great (though i'm no fan of megan fox), the sterility of the photos cannot compare to the sensuality & warmth of the vogue ones.

    Reply
  33. the idea of model & mannequin was done before, with eniko mihalik in vogue paris. while i think this is great (though i'm no fan of megan fox), the sterility of the photos cannot compare to the sensuality & warmth of the vogue ones.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to h a u t e . m e s s Cancel reply