Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published April 26, 2010

The Block shows us Marilyn Agency‘s most promising fresh faces with a dark and macabre spread published in their spring issue. Photographed by Louis Christopher, Kristina Krivomazova, Hannah Johnson, Josefin Hedstrom, Tetyana McInychuk, Yulia Leontieva, Melodie Dagault, Rel Dade, Chantal Stafford Abbott and Thana Kuhnen wear a mix of vintage garments and powerful accessories from the likes of Givenchy, Park Choon Moo and Longchamp styled by James Worthington DeMolet.











Recent Updates

Jennie Maison Kitsune Featured

Jennie is Pretty in Pastels for Maison Kitsuné Ad

Spring 2024 welcomes Jennie of Blackpink as the new face of Maison Kitsuné's Baby Fox collection. In a laid-back ad ...
Neiman Marcus Spring 2024 Featured

Neiman Marcus Spring 2024 Campaign: Championing Elegance

Neiman Marcus embraces the dynamism of sports and luxury fashion in its "Quest for the Best" spring 2024 campaign, captured ...
Swarovski Spring 2024 Featured

Irina Shayk, Karlie Kloss Bring Mermaidcore to Swarovski Ad

Swarovski takes a deep dive into the mythical with its spring-summer 2024 campaign, channeling the allure of Venus and embracing ...
Oliver Peoples Khaite Spring 2024 Featured

Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024: Crafting Chic Eyewear

The Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024 collection promises an eyewear feast for the fashion-forward. Exemplifying an industrial chic aesthetic, ...
Nina Cosmic Featured

Nina T Gets Interstellar for Numéro Switzerland

In "Cosmic Being," photographed by Ana Abril, a futuristic fashion editorial takes place in Numéro Switzerland's premiere issue. Model Nina ...
Zara Jeans Spring Featured

Zara Jeans Spring 2024: Exploring Casual Styles

The season of renewal brings with it Zara's spring 2024 jeans collection, offering a refreshing take on denim that pays ...

17 thoughts on “Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010”

  1. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  2. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  3. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  4. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply

Leave a Reply to courtenay Cancel reply