Luma Grothe by John de Lima for i-D Online

It Was Acceptable in the 70s – Photographer John de Lima lenses this fantastically colorful shoot for i-D online featuring model Luma Grothe (Premier). The editorial was shot in artist Samara Scott’s 70s inspired set designed for the Frieze Art Fair, a “visual themepark.” Stylist Sabrina Henry creates looks that fall somewhere between 70s glam and Japanese street fashion, using candy colored selects including John Galliano, Giles, Stella McCartney, Christopher Kane, Marni, Mark Fast, Preen, Gucci and Thakoon. Hair stylist Charlie le Mindu creates pastel and brightly hued tresses, and make-up artist Isamaya Ffrench gives Luma a disco doll face.











13 Responses to “Luma Grothe by John de Lima for i-D Online”

  1. i loved every single picture bar the one with the gold heavy knit coat
    such a fun editorial , a great contrast to the very serious ones

    STYLE DECORUM

  2. The last image is very disturbing somehow …

    XoXoPlamihttp://www.fashionthrill.com/

  3. Dumbfoundedphotographer Reply

    It’s incredible how many people here are swayed by these amateurish style of photography editorials. Do you people get off to Facebook pictures too? I don’t get it, is it the bright colors that gets you people?

    •  It’s funny that you’re a photographer and somehow turned off by “amateur” style automatically. Plenty of people, even photographers (& especially those who consider photography an art form), appreciate this style because they realize that a photograph does not have to have professional/outdoor lighting, well-balanced color in order to be a good photograph. What people love about these is there is a consistency of theme, execution, and styling. The gratuitous amount of bags, the tackiness of the colors and poses, the obvious satire of this shoot is reflected in the “amateur” photography. It wouldn’t make any sense to photograph these particular photographs in any other way. It’s not like Terry Richardson, using the same amateur style to photograph a thousand different people, with no purpose in mind. The style of photography here GIVES them a purpose, or at least furthers the purpose. The high art community has accepted faux naif, ugly, uncomfortable for a long time and it’s about time photographers caught on. It’s like saying Christopher Nolan is the best director of film. I’m not saying *you* have to like these photographs, but it is possible to appreciate these from a photographer’s or artist’s perspective, even if *you* don’t.

  4. Completely agree with dumbfoundedphotographer.  This is a poor excuse for an editorial; the lighting alone is utterly appalling. 

    • But that is the whole point.. I understand what you mean but thats the point. 

  5. Anyastepanova Reply

    love the colors but the wrong choice of model, too much voulgar face!

  6. I agree that the photography style suits the shoot, and it’s artisticlaly impressive. Revisiting a retro style with a modern eye and sense of humour.

    Don’t you people get that rules are meant to be broken? How dull and predictable a world would we live in if everyone stuck strictly to the guidelines of everything and never strayed outside them to experiment and create something NEW and EXCITING. 

    All of the greatest artists in history were innovators who broke the boundaries, shocked and appalled all the boring old farts and were later remembered for their talent.

    Do you want to be those boring old farts or the innovators?

    I guess you’ve already made your choice!

  7. art appreciator Reply

    look, conceptual photography in one side, this editorial in the other. I don’t like anything in it, pretty bad.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *