Karlie Kloss by Lachlan Bailey in Spring Romance | 25 Magazine Spring 2010

After an alluring spread from April’s Numéro, Lachlan Bailey shoots model Karlie Kloss once more for the spring edition of 25 Magazine. Captured in a bedroom setting full of florals and shadows, Bailey photographs suggestive ensembles styled by Alastair McKimm in Spring Romance.





39 Responses to “Karlie Kloss by Lachlan Bailey in Spring Romance | 25 Magazine Spring 2010”

  1. Ooooh this is just lovley. So soft. But I hope just because Karlie is now nearing 18, photographers don't shoot her semi/nude. Karlie just dosn't suit that. :/

  2. Ooooh this is just lovley. So soft. But I hope just because Karlie is now nearing 18, photographers don't shoot her semi/nude. Karlie just dosn't suit that. :/

  3. I agree on this editorial being soft & lovely. However, I think there's a time and place for everything, even Karlie being (semi) nude. Question at hand is, will we see that time and place? Will it be properly used, or will it be abused? :l

  4. I agree on this editorial being soft & lovely. However, I think there's a time and place for everything, even Karlie being (semi) nude. Question at hand is, will we see that time and place? Will it be properly used, or will it be abused? :l

  5. I think with a girl as well known as Karlie, she won't have to do anything that she doesn't want to do. It can ultimately be her decision whether or not she poses nude, because she will still be famous either way.

  6. I think with a girl as well known as Karlie, she won't have to do anything that she doesn't want to do. It can ultimately be her decision whether or not she poses nude, because she will still be famous either way.

  7. I don't get it….what's wrong with nudity?….it's nothing to be embarrassed about. Bet you lot supplied the white paint to draw them white little frocks all over the Sistine chapel.

    • nothing wrong with nudity, unless it is of course a fashion magazine as opposed to an art magazine, don't mind nudity here and there but in fashion i like to see fashion and the obviousness of some of the nudity these days borders on being there just for the sake of it…. open a button to see a nipple etc… gets boring.

  8. I don't get it….what's wrong with nudity?….it's nothing to be embarrassed about. Bet you lot supplied the white paint to draw them white little frocks all over the Sistine chapel.

    • nothing wrong with nudity, unless it is of course a fashion magazine as opposed to an art magazine, don't mind nudity here and there but in fashion i like to see fashion and the obviousness of some of the nudity these days borders on being there just for the sake of it…. open a button to see a nipple etc… gets boring.

  9. I agree that underage models should have no part in nude or even implied…it's just not
    necessary since there are so many of-age models to fulfill that role in a story. Plus, we've all seen Karlie grow up during her career, but when she's older it will still be hard to see her take on those roles, regardless ha.

  10. I agree that underage models should have no part in nude or even implied…it's just not
    necessary since there are so many of-age models to fulfill that role in a story. Plus, we've all seen Karlie grow up during her career, but when she's older it will still be hard to see her take on those roles, regardless ha.

  11. What's wrong with nudity is that people complaining about this know that she's 17. These aren't even nude though so I don't get what the problem actually is. Karlie looks great, imo.

  12. What's wrong with nudity is that people complaining about this know that she's 17. These aren't even nude though so I don't get what the problem actually is. Karlie looks great, imo.

  13. Look I agree with FASHIONOGRAPHY … I don't think this even qualifies for implied nudity let alone worth kickin a fuss over. Sure, I didn't realize that she's that young but you see more in a mall or high street from a lot younger (let alone the beach). But I am thankful to the world that doesn't restrict its creativity to the boundaries of the more bashful or conservative. An if its clothing you want to see maybe photographers should start using mannequins from storefronts to please the like of you.

  14. Look I agree with FASHIONOGRAPHY … I don't think this even qualifies for implied nudity let alone worth kickin a fuss over. Sure, I didn't realize that she's that young but you see more in a mall or high street from a lot younger (let alone the beach). But I am thankful to the world that doesn't restrict its creativity to the boundaries of the more bashful or conservative. An if its clothing you want to see maybe photographers should start using mannequins from storefronts to please the like of you.

  15. she is too young to be photographed in sexual poses in her underwear.

  16. she is too young to be photographed in sexual poses in her underwear.

  17. I hope to see Karlie nudity very soon. I’m not a maniac, only a beauty lover. and Karlie is already sooo sexy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *