Connect
To Top

Karlie Kloss by Lachlan Bailey in Spring Romance | 25 Magazine Spring 2010

After an alluring spread from April’s Numéro, Lachlan Bailey shoots model Karlie Kloss once more for the spring edition of 25 Magazine. Captured in a bedroom setting full of florals and shadows, Bailey photographs suggestive ensembles styled by Alastair McKimm in Spring Romance.





Shop New Styles

39 Comments

  1. meg

    April 30, 2010 at 1:34 pm

    Ooooh this is just lovley. So soft. But I hope just because Karlie is now nearing 18, photographers don't shoot her semi/nude. Karlie just dosn't suit that. :/

  2. meg

    April 30, 2010 at 1:34 pm

    Ooooh this is just lovley. So soft. But I hope just because Karlie is now nearing 18, photographers don't shoot her semi/nude. Karlie just dosn't suit that. :/

  3. ARRONDISSEMENT-A

    April 30, 2010 at 1:41 pm

    I agree on this editorial being soft & lovely. However, I think there's a time and place for everything, even Karlie being (semi) nude. Question at hand is, will we see that time and place? Will it be properly used, or will it be abused? :l

  4. ARRONDISSEMENT-A

    April 30, 2010 at 1:41 pm

    I agree on this editorial being soft & lovely. However, I think there's a time and place for everything, even Karlie being (semi) nude. Question at hand is, will we see that time and place? Will it be properly used, or will it be abused? :l

  5. Dave

    April 30, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    I think with a girl as well known as Karlie, she won't have to do anything that she doesn't want to do. It can ultimately be her decision whether or not she poses nude, because she will still be famous either way.

  6. Dave

    April 30, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    I think with a girl as well known as Karlie, she won't have to do anything that she doesn't want to do. It can ultimately be her decision whether or not she poses nude, because she will still be famous either way.

  7. UglyKidJoel

    April 30, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    I don't get it….what's wrong with nudity?….it's nothing to be embarrassed about. Bet you lot supplied the white paint to draw them white little frocks all over the Sistine chapel.

    • edward

      May 2, 2010 at 2:27 pm

      nothing wrong with nudity, unless it is of course a fashion magazine as opposed to an art magazine, don't mind nudity here and there but in fashion i like to see fashion and the obviousness of some of the nudity these days borders on being there just for the sake of it…. open a button to see a nipple etc… gets boring.

  8. UglyKidJoel

    April 30, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    I don't get it….what's wrong with nudity?….it's nothing to be embarrassed about. Bet you lot supplied the white paint to draw them white little frocks all over the Sistine chapel.

    • edward

      May 2, 2010 at 2:27 pm

      nothing wrong with nudity, unless it is of course a fashion magazine as opposed to an art magazine, don't mind nudity here and there but in fashion i like to see fashion and the obviousness of some of the nudity these days borders on being there just for the sake of it…. open a button to see a nipple etc… gets boring.

  9. Ola

    April 30, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    Karlie is beauty!!

  10. Ola

    April 30, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    Karlie is beauty!!

  11. Fashion CHALET

    April 30, 2010 at 7:39 pm

    THIS IS PURE BEAUTY <3

    xx

  12. Fashion CHALET

    April 30, 2010 at 7:39 pm

    THIS IS PURE BEAUTY <3

    xx

  13. John R

    April 30, 2010 at 7:52 pm

    I agree that underage models should have no part in nude or even implied…it's just not
    necessary since there are so many of-age models to fulfill that role in a story. Plus, we've all seen Karlie grow up during her career, but when she's older it will still be hard to see her take on those roles, regardless ha.

  14. John R

    April 30, 2010 at 7:52 pm

    I agree that underage models should have no part in nude or even implied…it's just not
    necessary since there are so many of-age models to fulfill that role in a story. Plus, we've all seen Karlie grow up during her career, but when she's older it will still be hard to see her take on those roles, regardless ha.

  15. A.J. Fung

    April 30, 2010 at 8:23 pm

    Beautiful. To chime in on nudity in editorials. I have nothing against it, as it can be very beautiful when executed tastefully. My issue is that there is an over saturation of it and it takes away from when it is done right…
    http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com

  16. A.J. Fung

    April 30, 2010 at 8:23 pm

    Beautiful. To chime in on nudity in editorials. I have nothing against it, as it can be very beautiful when executed tastefully. My issue is that there is an over saturation of it and it takes away from when it is done right…
    http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com

  17. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    April 30, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    Good thing this isn't nude or implied then, huh?

  18. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    April 30, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    Good thing this isn't nude or implied then, huh?

  19. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    April 30, 2010 at 10:29 pm

    What's wrong with nudity is that people complaining about this know that she's 17. These aren't even nude though so I don't get what the problem actually is. Karlie looks great, imo.

  20. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    April 30, 2010 at 10:29 pm

    What's wrong with nudity is that people complaining about this know that she's 17. These aren't even nude though so I don't get what the problem actually is. Karlie looks great, imo.

  21. caroline

    May 1, 2010 at 12:38 am

    those two last pics were kinda unnecessary

  22. caroline

    May 1, 2010 at 12:38 am

    those two last pics were kinda unnecessary

  23. mayhemonte

    May 1, 2010 at 9:47 am

    I'm liking Karlie more and more

  24. mayhemonte

    May 1, 2010 at 2:47 am

    I'm liking Karlie more and more

  25. moo

    May 1, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    i love karlie kloss. special

  26. moo

    May 1, 2010 at 10:19 am

    i love karlie kloss. special

  27. Cait

    May 1, 2010 at 10:49 pm

    Karlie looks amazing here!

  28. Cait

    May 1, 2010 at 10:49 pm

    Karlie looks amazing here!

  29. UglyKidJoel

    May 2, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    Look I agree with FASHIONOGRAPHY … I don't think this even qualifies for implied nudity let alone worth kickin a fuss over. Sure, I didn't realize that she's that young but you see more in a mall or high street from a lot younger (let alone the beach). But I am thankful to the world that doesn't restrict its creativity to the boundaries of the more bashful or conservative. An if its clothing you want to see maybe photographers should start using mannequins from storefronts to please the like of you.

  30. UglyKidJoel

    May 2, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    Look I agree with FASHIONOGRAPHY … I don't think this even qualifies for implied nudity let alone worth kickin a fuss over. Sure, I didn't realize that she's that young but you see more in a mall or high street from a lot younger (let alone the beach). But I am thankful to the world that doesn't restrict its creativity to the boundaries of the more bashful or conservative. An if its clothing you want to see maybe photographers should start using mannequins from storefronts to please the like of you.

  31. Liu

    May 3, 2010 at 12:08 pm

    pretty

  32. Liu

    May 3, 2010 at 12:08 pm

    pretty

  33. guest

    May 6, 2010 at 11:13 am

    she is too young to be photographed in sexual poses in her underwear.

    • fashgonerogue

      May 6, 2010 at 12:22 pm

      Um…at seventeen, these photos are really not that risque.

  34. guest

    May 6, 2010 at 4:13 am

    she is too young to be photographed in sexual poses in her underwear.

    • fashgonerogue

      May 6, 2010 at 5:22 am

      Um…at seventeen, these photos are really not that risque.

  35. up

    August 25, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    I hope to see Karlie nudity very soon. I’m not a maniac, only a beauty lover. and Karlie is already sooo sexy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in 25 Magazine