Joséphine de la Baume by Cameron Smith for Oyster #88

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published August 17, 2010

What’s fashion without a little sacrilege? This seems to be the question posed in Oyster’s August issue as actress Joséphine de la Baume takes to the church and grave yard in provocative looks styled by Mags Crow. In front of Cameron Smith’s lens, Josephine dons a wardrobe of Christopher Kane, Miu Miu, Dolce & Gabbana and more in the dreamy spread.











Recent Updates

Swarovski Spring 2024 Featured

Irina Shayk, Karlie Kloss Bring Mermaidcore to Swarovski Ad

Swarovski takes a deep dive into the mythical with its spring-summer 2024 campaign, channeling the allure of Venus and embracing ...
Oliver Peoples Khaite Spring 2024 Featured

Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024: Crafting Chic Eyewear

The Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024 collection promises an eyewear feast for the fashion-forward. Exemplifying an industrial chic aesthetic, ...
Nina Cosmic Featured

Nina T Gets Interstellar for Numéro Switzerland

In "Cosmic Being," photographed by Ana Abril, a futuristic fashion editorial takes place in Numéro Switzerland's premiere issue. Model Nina ...
Zara Jeans Spring Featured

Zara Jeans Spring 2024: Exploring Casual Styles

The season of renewal brings with it Zara's spring 2024 jeans collection, offering a refreshing take on denim that pays ...
Makeup Looks Featured

Makeup Looks to Inspire: 15 Stunning Ideas for 2024

Makeup looks offer a canvas for self-expression, blending everything from the subtle allure of neutral tones to the vibrant impact ...
Penelope Cruz Chanel Iconic Handbag Featured

Penélope Cruz & Brad Pitt Are Iconic in Chanel Handbag Ad

Chanel's 2024 campaign for its Iconic Handbag enlists the magnetic allure of Penélope Cruz alongside Brad Pitt, offering a theme ...

20 thoughts on “Joséphine de la Baume by Cameron Smith for Oyster #88”

  1. All style no content. Effect for effects sake. Trite, poorly executed and without meaning.
    @ Tania – it is not different, this is an overused effect. Every second photographer, devoid of creativity uses this "filter"
    @ vickyleestyle – for God's sake – have an opinion. Don't leave passion out the door.

    Reply
  2. All style no content. Effect for effects sake. Trite, poorly executed and without meaning.
    @ Tania – it is not different, this is an overused effect. Every second photographer, devoid of creativity uses this "filter"
    @ vickyleestyle – for God's sake – have an opinion. Don't leave passion out the door.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Almita Cancel reply