Joséphine de la Baume by Cameron Smith for Oyster #88

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published August 17, 2010

What’s fashion without a little sacrilege? This seems to be the question posed in Oyster’s August issue as actress Joséphine de la Baume takes to the church and grave yard in provocative looks styled by Mags Crow. In front of Cameron Smith’s lens, Josephine dons a wardrobe of Christopher Kane, Miu Miu, Dolce & Gabbana and more in the dreamy spread.











Recent Updates

Denim Story Feature

Exclusive: Alina & Jette by Carmelo Donato in ‘Denim Remixed’

In a striking fashion feature captured by Carmelo Donato, FGR's latest exclusive focuses on denim, with models Alina Enders and ...
Logan Hollowell Silk Collection

Logan Hollowell’s Silk Collection Delivers Goddess Glam

Logan Hollowell, known for its fine jewelry, ventures into ready-to-wear with the debut of its Silk Collection. The 100% silk ...
Ana de Armas Estee Lauder

Ana de Armas is a Vision in Estée Lauder Lipstick Ad

Ana de Armas captivates in Estée Lauder's latest advertisement, embracing the opulent glow of the new Re-Nutriv Diamond Serum Lipcolor ...
Spell Bohemian Royale

Spell’s Bohemian Royale Print Gets an Eco-Chic Makeover

Spell's latest Renew collection marks a decade of the beloved Bohemian Royale print, demonstrating the brand's commitment to sustainable fashion ...
Kylie Jenner KHY Denim

Kylie Jenner Heats Up Denim With Khy Drop 005 Collection

Khy, the brand driven by Kylie Jenner's fashion instincts, presents its latest creation, Drop 005, a collection focusing on denim ...
Zuhair Murad Bridal Spring 2025

Zuhair Murad Bridal’s Spring 2025 Dresses Are a Must-See

Zuhair Murad's Bridal Spring 2025 collection is a captivating tribute to ancient Phoenician culture, weaving historical opulence with modern bridal ...

20 thoughts on “Joséphine de la Baume by Cameron Smith for Oyster #88”

  1. All style no content. Effect for effects sake. Trite, poorly executed and without meaning.
    @ Tania – it is not different, this is an overused effect. Every second photographer, devoid of creativity uses this "filter"
    @ vickyleestyle – for God's sake – have an opinion. Don't leave passion out the door.

    Reply
  2. All style no content. Effect for effects sake. Trite, poorly executed and without meaning.
    @ Tania – it is not different, this is an overused effect. Every second photographer, devoid of creativity uses this "filter"
    @ vickyleestyle – for God's sake – have an opinion. Don't leave passion out the door.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Tania Cancel reply