Connect
To Top

Jenny Sinkaberg by Dancian for Zoo Fall 2010

Jenny Sinkaberg is certainly no wallflower for her latest work in Zoo Magazine’s fall issue. Photographed by Dancian and styled by Jo Barker, Jenny sports a rebellious wardrobe of leather, lace and black. Featuring the likes of Yohji Yamamoto, Balmain and Givenchy, the Given to Fly features wild hair paired with even wilder poses.









27 Comments

  1. mia oak

    September 14, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    could be an amazing work if she had’nt always that same boring face

  2. Kerry

    September 14, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    there’s something so awkward about her posing.

  3. Kerry

    September 14, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    there’s something so awkward about her posing.

  4. Ferdinand

    September 15, 2010 at 2:11 am

    How does an editorial like this ever get approved for publication. It’s sloppy. They didn’t even bother cleaning her toes in the color shot with the shoes. Get a manicurist. This reflects badly not only on their team but the people at Zoo.

    • Ruby B

      September 15, 2010 at 3:23 am

      i just looked through your comments and you are kinda bitter towards everything huh? maybe look at the positives rather than bad mouth everything…. or post something you have done…

      • Ferdinand

        September 15, 2010 at 10:38 pm

        Next time when you sit in front of an editor, advise them to look at your work positively instead of giving you an honest critic. You can also ask them to show you work they have shot, and if you still don’t like their reply, you can just call them bitter. I give credit when I see good work, so please forgive me if I have higher standards than you do. What positives have you mentioned about this work? You actually like this? You think this cool and done well? What do you like about it?

    • Ruby B

      September 15, 2010 at 3:23 am

      i just looked through your comments and you are kinda bitter towards everything huh? maybe look at the positives rather than bad mouth everything…. or post something you have done…

  5. Anonymous

    September 15, 2010 at 9:15 pm

    I think you missing the point. They meant to be awkward, real and not perfect. I personally love them and love the crazy hair.. Probably a bit too arty for you to understand.. sorry

    • Ferdinand

      September 15, 2010 at 10:43 pm

      Now I would call Roversi’s light painting work on Polaroid arty. If you want to take it a step further and bring painting into the picture, we can talk about Francis Bacon’s “arty” work. How did you make this statement and not feel embarrassed?

      • Ruby B

        September 16, 2010 at 12:15 am

        are you an editor? do you have the credentials to back up your statements? i would love to hear ideas about bacon and why in particular you brought him up? the point i am trying to make is this is a forum to explore what has been published recently, to discuss it positively in the most part, i am sure the photographer, model, stylist, hair stylist or make up artist may see your insightful and completely off point comments, do you want them to retouch away her normal toes, send us a picture of your freshly cleaned toes ferdinand….. as for the editorial itself, i agree it is not the best most interesting spread i have seen but it also is far from sloppy and unfit for publication, basically if you dont like it move on to something you do and let us all know you actually do like something!

        • Ferdinand

          September 16, 2010 at 1:54 am

          Dancian, the photographer who shot this editorial, normally does good work. Everybody is entitled to a hiccup. I wasn’t suggesting they Photoshop anything. I don’t like overly retouched work. Nonetheless, her face has been retouched, so the realism that Paul Morris alludes to has already been crossed. When filmmakers make average movies, their work gets critiqued heavily, not only by critics but the public at large. Why should fashion avoid criticism? Criticism is necessary, without which no one will ever strive to improve a product. This is largely the reason why average editorials get published more often than not. I don’t feel the need to present credentials to random people on-line. We can pretend I’m anything you like, it doesn’t matter. I like many editorials. Hundreds of editorials shot but unknowns and by masters such as Roversi, Avedon, Penn, etc. You haven’t yet mentioned what you think is great about this story? What did you take away from it? Did it inspire anything or was this just a wardrobe display for window shoppers?

          • me

            September 16, 2010 at 11:23 am

            oi ferdinand, if your such an educated knowledgeable big shot, what on earth are you doing on here arguing the toss with these people, shouldn’t you be doing something more important and worthwhile, like curating a retrospective on jumped up, self important, fashion wannabe’s throughout history. thankyou and goodnight ..

          • me

            September 16, 2010 at 11:23 am

            oi ferdinand, if your such an educated knowledgeable big shot, what on earth are you doing on here arguing the toss with these people, shouldn’t you be doing something more important and worthwhile, like curating a retrospective on jumped up, self important, fashion wannabe’s throughout history. thankyou and goodnight ..

          • me

            September 16, 2010 at 11:23 am

            oi ferdinand, if your such an educated knowledgeable big shot, what on earth are you doing on here arguing the toss with these people, shouldn’t you be doing something more important and worthwhile, like curating a retrospective on jumped up, self important, fashion wannabe’s throughout history. thankyou and goodnight ..

          • me

            September 16, 2010 at 11:23 am

            oi ferdinand, if your such an educated knowledgeable big shot, what on earth are you doing on here arguing the toss with these people, shouldn’t you be doing something more important and worthwhile, like curating a retrospective on jumped up, self important, fashion wannabe’s throughout history. thankyou and goodnight ..

          • Edwardm

            September 16, 2010 at 12:58 pm

            thats exactly what it is, its a fashion magazine, to sell clothes, read an art magazine that displays art photography if you want that…

          • Edwardm

            September 16, 2010 at 12:58 pm

            thats exactly what it is, its a fashion magazine, to sell clothes, read an art magazine that displays art photography if you want that…

      • Ruby B

        September 16, 2010 at 12:15 am

        are you an editor? do you have the credentials to back up your statements? i would love to hear ideas about bacon and why in particular you brought him up? the point i am trying to make is this is a forum to explore what has been published recently, to discuss it positively in the most part, i am sure the photographer, model, stylist, hair stylist or make up artist may see your insightful and completely off point comments, do you want them to retouch away her normal toes, send us a picture of your freshly cleaned toes ferdinand….. as for the editorial itself, i agree it is not the best most interesting spread i have seen but it also is far from sloppy and unfit for publication, basically if you dont like it move on to something you do and let us all know you actually do like something!

    • Ferdinand

      September 15, 2010 at 10:43 pm

      Now I would call Roversi’s light painting work on Polaroid arty. If you want to take it a step further and bring painting into the picture, we can talk about Francis Bacon’s “arty” work. How did you make this statement and not feel embarrassed?

  6. Anonymous

    September 15, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    love this!! Jenny is great one of the most interesting faces around, less ordinary than the dolly-lookalike they’re been using in the Vogue’s and LOVEee, POPppwannabeLOVE-
    especially French Vogue..

  7. Anonymous

    September 15, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    love this!! Jenny is great one of the most interesting faces around, less ordinary than the dolly-lookalike they’re been using in the Vogue’s and LOVEee, POPppwannabeLOVE-
    especially French Vogue..

  8. Lena

    September 18, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    just weird .

  9. Lena

    September 18, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    just weird .

  10. Lena

    September 18, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    just weird .

  11. anne

    September 22, 2010 at 4:41 pm

    it is 1 of the most boring editorials i have seen in a while..scrolling down the page feels like seeing the same image over and over again!

  12. oliviaxx

    September 24, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    Love this a lot. Crazy but great.. Unusual..

  13. Micaela Varela

    October 24, 2010 at 12:36 am

    Sory, I don’t like it…. at all. But I respect the work that’s behind this editorial, maybe the next time it’ll be better, not so ….. messy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

More in 2010