Connect
To Top

Gigi & Irena by Lara Jade for Material Girl

Cotton Candy Girls – Photographer Lara Jade takes to the open fields and blue skies for the latest issue of Material Girl. Working with stylist Lauren Armes, Jade captures Gigi and Irena in airy ethereal looks with pink bobs courtesy of hair stylist Damian Monzillo. / Makeup by Damian Monzillo, Retouching by Lara Jade






Shop New Styles

56 Comments

  1. Devi_lecter

    May 8, 2011 at 11:42 pm

    ohmygod…i looove the pastel colors!!!

    but the photography technique is very usual

    devi-kusumawardani.blogspot.com

  2. Alafemmeblog

    May 9, 2011 at 12:26 am

    I really love the softness of this editorial, its very beautiful!!

  3. Myjestik

    May 9, 2011 at 12:29 am

    both girls are very beautiful

  4. Myjestik

    May 9, 2011 at 12:29 am

    both girls are very beautiful

  5. EditaLover

    May 9, 2011 at 1:19 am

    Amazing photography.

  6. EditaLover

    May 9, 2011 at 1:19 am

    Amazing photography.

  7. Timothy

    May 9, 2011 at 2:06 am

    Great Lara Jade style.

  8. Marinela Reyes

    May 9, 2011 at 2:35 am

    Beautiful.

  9. Marinela Reyes

    May 9, 2011 at 2:35 am

    Beautiful.

  10. Marinela Reyes

    May 9, 2011 at 2:35 am

    Beautiful.

  11. Leonie Ng

    May 9, 2011 at 3:15 am

    totally in love with the colors/ styling and photography!

    btw do drop by my site as i have EXTENDED THE BRASHY x MONSTRE XI GIVEAWAY by a week. No harm trying your luck for a cool tshirt (:

    x leonie

  12. The Visions of Memories Girl

    May 9, 2011 at 3:22 am

    Ooooh my god, the hair and the balloons? Adorable!

  13. The Visions of Memories Girl

    May 9, 2011 at 3:22 am

    Ooooh my god, the hair and the balloons? Adorable!

  14. The Visions of Memories Girl

    May 9, 2011 at 3:22 am

    Ooooh my god, the hair and the balloons? Adorable!

  15. Rara Dorries

    May 9, 2011 at 5:01 am

    Very cute!

  16. Rebecca Litchfield

    May 9, 2011 at 11:12 am

    Love it, the colours are very pretty

  17. 90046

    May 9, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    It’s good but not great.

  18. Guest

    May 9, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.

  19. Anonymous

    May 9, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    Like the styling and pastel colour blocking, but something about the photography makes the shoot seem to fall a bit short of it’s potential.

    ___________________________
    http://theperfectplacetostart.blogspot.com/

  20. Ghost

    May 9, 2011 at 1:39 pm

    “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    • anonymous

      May 9, 2011 at 6:46 pm

      The person above you isn’t “hating,” they gave their opinion in a very polite and intelligent way. If they don’t like the photography, then they don’t like it, everyone feels differently about things as subjective as this editorial.

      • Ghost

        May 9, 2011 at 7:24 pm

        I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

      • Ghost

        May 9, 2011 at 7:24 pm

        I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

        • Dyllis_filler

          May 9, 2011 at 7:30 pm

          oh calm down Lara!

        • Dyllis_filler

          May 9, 2011 at 7:30 pm

          oh calm down Lara!

          • Ghost

            May 9, 2011 at 7:36 pm

            Ha no, but nice. No pienso que ella puede hablar espanol jajaja, pero pienso que tu es una puta.

          • Ghost

            May 9, 2011 at 7:36 pm

            Ha no, but nice. No pienso que ella puede hablar espanol jajaja, pero pienso que tu es una puta.

          • Fashion Gone Rogue

            May 10, 2011 at 1:16 am

            Either stick to talking to the work or take your argument elsewhere.

            (Comments have been removed from this thread for violating our comment policy. View it here.)

        • Dyllis_filler

          May 9, 2011 at 7:30 pm

          oh calm down Lara!

        • Dyllis_filler

          May 10, 2011 at 12:29 am

          tu me parecen una putta meirda hijo de puta cuarenta y cinco anos el peluquero

        • Dyllis_filler

          May 10, 2011 at 12:29 am

          tu me parecen una putta meirda hijo de puta cuarenta y cinco anos el peluquero

        • Dyllis_filler

          May 10, 2011 at 12:29 am

          tu me parecen una putta meirda hijo de puta cuarenta y cinco anos el peluquero

        • Dyllis_filler

          May 10, 2011 at 12:29 am

          tu me parecen una putta meirda hijo de puta cuarenta y cinco anos el peluquero

        • Dyllis_filler

          May 10, 2011 at 12:29 am

          tu me parecen una putta meirda hijo de puta cuarenta y cinco anos el peluquero

        • baboonbutt

          May 10, 2011 at 6:03 pm

          lawl, why do all the Lara Jade eds bring out the fanbois sheeple

          • baboonbutt

            May 10, 2011 at 6:05 pm

            I have to say I agree about the stupid textures. They are bad enough on their own, but using the exact same one more than once…just…no

      • Ghost

        May 9, 2011 at 7:24 pm

        I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

  21. Ghost

    May 9, 2011 at 1:39 pm

    “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

  22. Ghost

    May 9, 2011 at 1:39 pm

    “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

  23. Ghost

    May 9, 2011 at 1:39 pm

    “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

  24. Dyllis_filler

    May 9, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    It means well…but there is no attention to detail…like the fact that it is a brown, dry, dirty looking setting, and the girls look cold, and those kind of cheap plastic wigs only look good when they have been trimmed..half-assed Tim Walker….not good

  25. kehari

    May 9, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    no chemistry between the models. they just dont look like they are close. leaves me cold.

  26. kehari

    May 9, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    no chemistry between the models. they just dont look like they are close. leaves me cold.

  27. january

    May 9, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    these are gorgeous.

    january, x

    jessicajanuary.com

  28. january

    May 9, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    these are gorgeous.

    january, x

    jessicajanuary.com

  29. Irina Bolotova

    May 9, 2011 at 7:23 pm

    great!

  30. Irina Bolotova

    May 9, 2011 at 7:23 pm

    great!

  31. Irina Bolotova

    May 9, 2011 at 7:23 pm

    great!

  32. Jayde

    May 9, 2011 at 7:44 pm

    The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

  33. Jayde

    May 9, 2011 at 7:44 pm

    The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

  34. Jayde

    May 9, 2011 at 7:44 pm

    The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

  35. pw

    May 10, 2011 at 12:11 am

    great styling, i don’t think this photography meets the standard of the website though, studenty.

  36. pw

    May 10, 2011 at 12:11 am

    great styling, i don’t think this photography meets the standard of the website though, studenty.

  37. diva

    May 22, 2011 at 4:45 am

    It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

  38. diva

    May 22, 2011 at 4:45 am

    It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

  39. Liliang3636

    September 13, 2011 at 2:14 am

         Well-known luxury brands (Louis Vuitton). Louis Vuitton was founded in 1854?authentic louis vuitton, now part of French post-production high luxury goods group Moet Hennessy LouisVuitton?louis vuitton black. Founder of the first post of Louis Vuitton LV jewelry industry for the elite aristocracy?louis vuitton outlet?when pack when traveling. He witnessed the invention of the steam train?louis vuitton wallet, also witnessed the development of steamshipcheap miu miu?transportation?cheap fendi, but also deeply appreciate the dome was closed stacked luggage difficulties?louis vuitton sofia coppola.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in 2011