Connect
To Top

Daria Werbowy by Mikael Jansson for Interview May 2010

The latest issue of Interview Magazine features Daria Werbowy as the center of attention with the steamy, Let’s Get Lost, by Mikael Jansson. Unfortunately, it is the editorial’s core cast of talented models such as Sedene Blake, Ajak Deng, Salieu Jalloh and Oraine Barrett that get lost in the misguided role of background noise.










Shop New Styles

144 Comments

  1. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    May 12, 2010 at 12:21 am

    lol, oh man…

  2. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    May 12, 2010 at 12:21 am

    lol, oh man…

  3. FASHIONOGRAPHY

    May 11, 2010 at 5:21 pm

    lol, oh man…

  4. Cameron

    May 12, 2010 at 12:46 am

    mmm fashion porn!

  5. Cameron

    May 12, 2010 at 12:46 am

    mmm fashion porn!

  6. Cameron

    May 11, 2010 at 5:46 pm

    mmm fashion porn!

  7. Ania

    May 12, 2010 at 12:53 am

    its the same pose in every photo

  8. Ania

    May 11, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    its the same pose in every photo

  9. YoungV

    May 12, 2010 at 1:02 am

    too much going on

    but i like the first pic a lot

  10. YoungV

    May 11, 2010 at 6:02 pm

    too much going on

    but i like the first pic a lot

  11. nek

    May 12, 2010 at 1:05 am

    i don't know how i feel about this

  12. nek

    May 11, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    i don't know how i feel about this

  13. kit

    May 12, 2010 at 1:12 am

    I don't know what strikes me as worse. The thought that whoever came up with the idea for this was completely oblivious to the shitstorm it's going to create or the thought that whoever came up with the idea for this was completely aware of the shitstorm it's going to create and rolled with it anyway. Either way it's shame because I think the photography is really great.

    • A.J. Fung

      May 12, 2010 at 5:13 pm

      Hi, Kit. I am pretty sure they were not oblivious, and even meant to cause controversy… after all, we are all talking about it! Lol

      • kit

        May 13, 2010 at 12:05 pm

        What you've said is kind of what my underlying point was, it must not have been as clear as I intended. I think using race/racial stereotypes as a way to be, as you said, controversial, is irresponsible. Furthermore, it's a cheap shot, if indeed the goal was to stir up some conversation.

        I don't know…like I said I love the photography, but I can't not take exception to this black-models-as-props vibe going on here. People are not props.

      • kit

        May 13, 2010 at 12:05 pm

        What you've said is kind of what my underlying point was, it must not have been as clear as I intended. I think using race/racial stereotypes as a way to be, as you said, controversial, is irresponsible. Furthermore, it's a cheap shot, if indeed the goal was to stir up some conversation.

        I don't know…like I said I love the photography, but I can't not take exception to this black-models-as-props vibe going on here. People are not props.

    • A.J. Fung

      May 12, 2010 at 5:13 pm

      Hi, Kit. I am pretty sure they were not oblivious, and even meant to cause controversy… after all, we are all talking about it! Lol

  14. kit

    May 11, 2010 at 6:12 pm

    I don't know what strikes me as worse. The thought that whoever came up with the idea for this was completely oblivious to the shitstorm it's going to create or the thought that whoever came up with the idea for this was completely aware of the shitstorm it's going to create and rolled with it anyway. Either way it's shame because I think the photography is really great.

    • A.J. Fung

      May 12, 2010 at 10:13 am

      Hi, Kit. I am pretty sure they were not oblivious, and even meant to cause controversy… after all, we are all talking about it! Lol

      • kit

        May 13, 2010 at 5:05 am

        What you've said is kind of what my underlying point was, it must not have been as clear as I intended. I think using race/racial stereotypes as a way to be, as you said, controversial, is irresponsible. Furthermore, it's a cheap shot, if indeed the goal was to stir up some conversation.

        I don't know…like I said I love the photography, but I can't not take exception to this black-models-as-props vibe going on here. People are not props.

  15. Cameron

    May 12, 2010 at 1:30 am

    what shit storm?? and why?

    • A.J. Fung

      May 12, 2010 at 5:11 pm

      Hi Cameron. The reason that this is controversial, and many may find this offensive is because the setting is basically an orgy pit, showcasing Daria's 'light' complexion against a backdrop/sea of 'dark' skinned, oiled up bodies. It brings up many issues involving race, sex and class…

      If you care to, scroll down the list of comments to see the rest of my 'take'

    • A.J. Fung

      May 12, 2010 at 5:11 pm

      Hi Cameron. The reason that this is controversial, and many may find this offensive is because the setting is basically an orgy pit, showcasing Daria's 'light' complexion against a backdrop/sea of 'dark' skinned, oiled up bodies. It brings up many issues involving race, sex and class…

      If you care to, scroll down the list of comments to see the rest of my 'take'

    • kit

      May 13, 2010 at 11:46 am

      lol irl if you are serious…

    • kit

      May 13, 2010 at 11:46 am

      lol irl if you are serious…

  16. Cameron

    May 11, 2010 at 6:30 pm

    what shit storm?? and why?

    • A.J. Fung

      May 12, 2010 at 10:11 am

      Hi Cameron. The reason that this is controversial, and many may find this offensive is because the setting is basically an orgy pit, showcasing Daria's 'light' complexion against a backdrop/sea of 'dark' skinned, oiled up bodies. It brings up many issues involving race, sex and class…

      If you care to, scroll down the list of comments to see the rest of my 'take'

    • kit

      May 13, 2010 at 4:46 am

      lol irl if you are serious…

  17. Petit Bizou

    May 12, 2010 at 1:36 am

    I think it's kind of fabulous. I mean, there isn't too much going on if you look at the pictures for what they are, there's lots to look at and it's a nice change (I don't think I'm the only one who's bored of a plain white back-drop and a pretty face). They have depth! The theme is easy enough to follow, you just have to appreciate how well they followed their plot. And the photography is amazing…

    • Fern

      May 22, 2010 at 6:25 pm

      Despite the fact I like the photography, I can't ignore the racism in it. The white woman looks like she's entranced by the black people that want to sexually devour her. The theme… Sexual experimentation? Doesn't seem really deep, just erotic. The wildness of it makes it alluring, even if you hate it.

    • Fern

      May 22, 2010 at 6:25 pm

      Despite the fact I like the photography, I can't ignore the racism in it. The white woman looks like she's entranced by the black people that want to sexually devour her. The theme… Sexual experimentation? Doesn't seem really deep, just erotic. The wildness of it makes it alluring, even if you hate it.

  18. Petit Bizou

    May 12, 2010 at 1:36 am

    I think it's kind of fabulous. I mean, there isn't too much going on if you look at the pictures for what they are, there's lots to look at and it's a nice change (I don't think I'm the only one who's bored of a plain white back-drop and a pretty face). They have depth! The theme is easy enough to follow, you just have to appreciate how well they followed their plot. And the photography is amazing…

  19. Petit Bizou

    May 11, 2010 at 6:36 pm

    I think it's kind of fabulous. I mean, there isn't too much going on if you look at the pictures for what they are, there's lots to look at and it's a nice change (I don't think I'm the only one who's bored of a plain white back-drop and a pretty face). They have depth! The theme is easy enough to follow, you just have to appreciate how well they followed their plot. And the photography is amazing…

    • Fern

      May 22, 2010 at 11:25 am

      Despite the fact I like the photography, I can't ignore the racism in it. The white woman looks like she's entranced by the black people that want to sexually devour her. The theme… Sexual experimentation? Doesn't seem really deep, just erotic. The wildness of it makes it alluring, even if you hate it.

  20. The Editor

    May 12, 2010 at 1:38 am

    is she supposed to be chet???

  21. The Editor

    May 12, 2010 at 1:38 am

    is she supposed to be chet???

  22. The Editor

    May 11, 2010 at 6:38 pm

    is she supposed to be chet???

  23. Dave

    May 12, 2010 at 1:43 am

    I do like the look and the idea, but as others have said, it does seem a little too busy.

  24. Dave

    May 12, 2010 at 1:43 am

    I do like the look and the idea, but as others have said, it does seem a little too busy.

  25. Dave

    May 11, 2010 at 6:43 pm

    I do like the look and the idea, but as others have said, it does seem a little too busy.

  26. nicholas

    May 12, 2010 at 2:32 am

    the one in picture 7, is it Nyabel from last time Janice Dickinson's modelling agency?

  27. nicholas

    May 12, 2010 at 2:32 am

    the one in picture 7, is it Nyabel from last time Janice Dickinson's modelling agency?

  28. nicholas

    May 11, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    the one in picture 7, is it Nyabel from last time Janice Dickinson's modelling agency?

  29. anonymous

    May 12, 2010 at 4:13 am

    Wow, I've never seen so many black folk in one fashion spread. Of course, they're drinking, dancing and hyper-sexualized.

  30. anonymous

    May 12, 2010 at 4:13 am

    Wow, I've never seen so many black folk in one fashion spread. Of course, they're drinking, dancing and hyper-sexualized.

  31. anonymous

    May 11, 2010 at 9:13 pm

    Wow, I've never seen so many black folk in one fashion spread. Of course, they're drinking, dancing and hyper-sexualized.

  32. anonymous

    May 12, 2010 at 4:14 am

    …and gang banging the white girl

  33. anonymous

    May 12, 2010 at 4:14 am

    …and gang banging the white girl

  34. anonymous

    May 11, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    …and gang banging the white girl

  35. h a u t e . m e s s

    May 12, 2010 at 4:47 am

    Uhhh. I like the concept of seeing more depth in editorials too, but this is not what I was thinking. I don't know where the hell to look. This is just straight up weird and trashy (not the good kind of trashy). I think the photography's pretty average.

    • theglossyqueen

      May 13, 2010 at 8:04 pm

      that's the exact word i was thinking. this is sooooo trashy and yes, not in a good way. the photo of daria in that pink one-piece with her legs spread just makes me want to cringe. i do love seeing people of color, but the way in which they are depicted in this just disgusts me – as someone said earlier 'gang banging the white girl' in reality she'd be the last one everyone would be looking at. Come on fashion get over your obsession with WHITE as RIGHT. its old and uninteresting.

      this editorial gets 2 thumbs way down.

    • theglossyqueen

      May 13, 2010 at 8:04 pm

      that's the exact word i was thinking. this is sooooo trashy and yes, not in a good way. the photo of daria in that pink one-piece with her legs spread just makes me want to cringe. i do love seeing people of color, but the way in which they are depicted in this just disgusts me – as someone said earlier 'gang banging the white girl' in reality she'd be the last one everyone would be looking at. Come on fashion get over your obsession with WHITE as RIGHT. its old and uninteresting.

      this editorial gets 2 thumbs way down.

    • bla

      May 22, 2010 at 6:18 pm

      ok i understand anyone being uncomfortable with how sexual it is (even though I am not), but the photography is pretty great.

    • bla

      May 22, 2010 at 6:18 pm

      ok i understand anyone being uncomfortable with how sexual it is (even though I am not), but the photography is pretty great.

  36. h a u t e . m e s s

    May 12, 2010 at 4:47 am

    Uhhh. I like the concept of seeing more depth in editorials too, but this is not what I was thinking. I don't know where the hell to look. This is just straight up weird and trashy (not the good kind of trashy). I think the photography's pretty average.

  37. h a u t e . m e s s

    May 11, 2010 at 9:47 pm

    Uhhh. I like the concept of seeing more depth in editorials too, but this is not what I was thinking. I don't know where the hell to look. This is just straight up weird and trashy (not the good kind of trashy). I think the photography's pretty average.

    • theglossyqueen

      May 13, 2010 at 1:04 pm

      that's the exact word i was thinking. this is sooooo trashy and yes, not in a good way. the photo of daria in that pink one-piece with her legs spread just makes me want to cringe. i do love seeing people of color, but the way in which they are depicted in this just disgusts me – as someone said earlier 'gang banging the white girl' in reality she'd be the last one everyone would be looking at. Come on fashion get over your obsession with WHITE as RIGHT. its old and uninteresting.

      this editorial gets 2 thumbs way down.

    • bla

      May 22, 2010 at 11:18 am

      ok i understand anyone being uncomfortable with how sexual it is (even though I am not), but the photography is pretty great.

  38. Cecilie Harris

    May 12, 2010 at 7:31 am

    Why all the negativity on these photos, I LOVE them! I love the chaos in the and I don't care if there is anything technically wrong to complain about. I obviously love fashion porn lol

  39. Cecilie Harris

    May 12, 2010 at 7:31 am

    Why all the negativity on these photos, I LOVE them! I love the chaos in the and I don't care if there is anything technically wrong to complain about. I obviously love fashion porn lol

  40. Cecilie Harris

    May 12, 2010 at 12:31 am

    Why all the negativity on these photos, I LOVE them! I love the chaos in the and I don't care if there is anything technically wrong to complain about. I obviously love fashion porn lol

  41. ka be

    May 12, 2010 at 8:16 am

    fabulous, gorgeous !

  42. ka be

    May 12, 2010 at 8:16 am

    fabulous, gorgeous !

  43. ka be

    May 12, 2010 at 1:16 am

    fabulous, gorgeous !

  44. Sahaz1

    May 12, 2010 at 10:18 am

    remind Steven Meisel "make love not war" = )
    its pretty work ! great

  45. Sahaz1

    May 12, 2010 at 3:18 am

    remind Steven Meisel "make love not war" = )
    its pretty work ! great

  46. ucef r jager

    May 12, 2010 at 10:21 am

    i love the colors !! this is great

  47. ucef r jager

    May 12, 2010 at 10:21 am

    i love the colors !! this is great

  48. ucef r jager

    May 12, 2010 at 3:21 am

    i love the colors !! this is great

  49. Szymon

    May 12, 2010 at 11:20 am

    so many things on these pics

  50. Szymon

    May 12, 2010 at 11:20 am

    so many things on these pics

  51. Szymon

    May 12, 2010 at 4:20 am

    so many things on these pics

  52. alex

    May 12, 2010 at 12:01 pm

    this is so wierd

  53. alex

    May 12, 2010 at 12:01 pm

    this is so wierd

  54. alex

    May 12, 2010 at 5:01 am

    this is so wierd

  55. @valkocompany

    May 12, 2010 at 12:08 pm

    Just perfect

  56. @valkocompany

    May 12, 2010 at 12:08 pm

    Just perfect

  57. @valkocompany

    May 12, 2010 at 5:08 am

    Just perfect

  58. Anonymous

    May 12, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    not sure i understand the concept. what's supposed to be going on here? some of the models are amazing, though.

  59. Anonymous

    May 12, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    not sure i understand the concept. what's supposed to be going on here? some of the models are amazing, though.

  60. Anonymous

    May 12, 2010 at 5:58 am

    not sure i understand the concept. what's supposed to be going on here? some of the models are amazing, though.

  61. Merel

    May 12, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    Daria is such a strong model.

  62. Merel

    May 12, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    Daria is such a strong model.

  63. Merel

    May 12, 2010 at 6:13 am

    Daria is such a strong model.

  64. Bikey

    May 12, 2010 at 1:31 pm

    These could have perfectly been Steven Klein´s

  65. Bikey

    May 12, 2010 at 6:31 am

    These could have perfectly been Steven Klein´s

  66. Anne of Carversville

    May 12, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    If you think there's too much 'going on' here, then you never looked at temple walls in India, Cambodia and those parts of the world where sensuality is totally embedded into the cultural monuments. Agree it's totally decadent, mixing subliminal Indian goddesses with the fall of Rome and our secular culture gone wild, but I'm with the minority who like it. Sexuality is not tidy. Also, this is a reality check across the ages. For every three moralistic Puritans, there's the underbelly of civilization. The French know shadows is where the real createurs live, and it's not always pretty or in Barbie girl, pitch-perfect focus.

  67. Anne of Carversville

    May 12, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    If you think there's too much 'going on' here, then you never looked at temple walls in India, Cambodia and those parts of the world where sensuality is totally embedded into the cultural monuments. Agree it's totally decadent, mixing subliminal Indian goddesses with the fall of Rome and our secular culture gone wild, but I'm with the minority who like it. Sexuality is not tidy. Also, this is a reality check across the ages. For every three moralistic Puritans, there's the underbelly of civilization. The French know shadows is where the real createurs live, and it's not always pretty or in Barbie girl, pitch-perfect focus.

  68. Anne of Carversville

    May 12, 2010 at 6:36 am

    If you think there's too much 'going on' here, then you never looked at temple walls in India, Cambodia and those parts of the world where sensuality is totally embedded into the cultural monuments. Agree it's totally decadent, mixing subliminal Indian goddesses with the fall of Rome and our secular culture gone wild, but I'm with the minority who like it. Sexuality is not tidy. Also, this is a reality check across the ages. For every three moralistic Puritans, there's the underbelly of civilization. The French know shadows is where the real createurs live, and it's not always pretty or in Barbie girl, pitch-perfect focus.

  69. Mari

    May 12, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    You definitely get lost in it! But Daria shines through. Love the contrasts and the photography is perfect. I like the chaos.

    • angela

      May 12, 2010 at 7:27 pm

      wow. i have a feeling you don't even see the subtext in your comment. yikes!

    • angela

      May 12, 2010 at 7:27 pm

      wow. i have a feeling you don't even see the subtext in your comment. yikes!

  70. Mari

    May 12, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    You definitely get lost in it! But Daria shines through. Love the contrasts and the photography is perfect. I like the chaos.

  71. Mari

    May 12, 2010 at 10:00 am

    You definitely get lost in it! But Daria shines through. Love the contrasts and the photography is perfect. I like the chaos.

    • angela

      May 12, 2010 at 12:27 pm

      wow. i have a feeling you don't even see the subtext in your comment. yikes!

  72. A.J. Fung

    May 12, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    The reason that this is controversial, and many may find this offensive is because the setting is basically an orgy pit, showcasing Daria's 'light' complexion against a backdrop/sea of 'dark' skinned, oiled up bodies. It brings up many issues involving race, sex and class.

    While I would usually have an issue with this kind of exploitation (for lack of a better word), I'm glad to see the other models besides Daria are featured on their own and with each other, and actually modeling the clothing for the story and not just used as 'props'.

    With that said, and thought it still gives me a bit of discomfort, I love the lighting and photography, and am always usually a fan of Interview's editorials, Jansson's work, and of course Daria…
    http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com

    • kit

      May 13, 2010 at 12:18 pm

      I think there's just that one shot that Daria doesn't feature in and the clothing is actually one of the things that annoyed me the most. The difference between what they have Daria wearing and what they have the other models wearing is another way to push them into the background. As the person above you said; Daria shines through.

    • kit

      May 13, 2010 at 12:18 pm

      I think there's just that one shot that Daria doesn't feature in and the clothing is actually one of the things that annoyed me the most. The difference between what they have Daria wearing and what they have the other models wearing is another way to push them into the background. As the person above you said; Daria shines through.

  73. A.J. Fung

    May 12, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    The reason that this is controversial, and many may find this offensive is because the setting is basically an orgy pit, showcasing Daria's 'light' complexion against a backdrop/sea of 'dark' skinned, oiled up bodies. It brings up many issues involving race, sex and class.

    While I would usually have an issue with this kind of exploitation (for lack of a better word), I'm glad to see the other models besides Daria are featured on their own and with each other, and actually modeling the clothing for the story and not just used as 'props'.

    With that said, and thought it still gives me a bit of discomfort, I love the lighting and photography, and am always usually a fan of Interview's editorials, Jansson's work, and of course Daria…
    http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com

  74. A.J. Fung

    May 12, 2010 at 10:09 am

    The reason that this is controversial, and many may find this offensive is because the setting is basically an orgy pit, showcasing Daria's 'light' complexion against a backdrop/sea of 'dark' skinned, oiled up bodies. It brings up many issues involving race, sex and class.

    While I would usually have an issue with this kind of exploitation (for lack of a better word), I'm glad to see the other models besides Daria are featured on their own and with each other, and actually modeling the clothing for the story and not just used as 'props'.

    With that said, and thought it still gives me a bit of discomfort, I love the lighting and photography, and am always usually a fan of Interview's editorials, Jansson's work, and of course Daria…
    http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com

    • kit

      May 13, 2010 at 5:18 am

      I think there's just that one shot that Daria doesn't feature in and the clothing is actually one of the things that annoyed me the most. The difference between what they have Daria wearing and what they have the other models wearing is another way to push them into the background. As the person above you said; Daria shines through.

  75. Antonio Jotta

    May 12, 2010 at 6:57 pm

  76. Antonio Jotta

    May 12, 2010 at 6:57 pm

  77. Antonio Jotta

    May 12, 2010 at 11:57 am

  78. zoe

    May 12, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    this is amazing! and all of the skin is so beautiful. definitely a nice break from all of the same stuff we keep seeing

  79. zoe

    May 12, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    this is amazing! and all of the skin is so beautiful. definitely a nice break from all of the same stuff we keep seeing

  80. zoe

    May 12, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    this is amazing! and all of the skin is so beautiful. definitely a nice break from all of the same stuff we keep seeing

  81. kirsten

    May 13, 2010 at 6:15 pm

    I love it. It's aesthetically pleasing, and that's all it's supposed to be, right?

  82. kirsten

    May 13, 2010 at 6:15 pm

    I love it. It's aesthetically pleasing, and that's all it's supposed to be, right?

  83. kirsten

    May 13, 2010 at 11:15 am

    I love it. It's aesthetically pleasing, and that's all it's supposed to be, right?

  84. Basement

    May 13, 2010 at 7:24 pm

    I love this, I think it's beautiful!! I think it's actually very sensual…. I think it's divine. And the black models used = amazing

  85. Basement

    May 13, 2010 at 7:24 pm

    I love this, I think it's beautiful!! I think it's actually very sensual…. I think it's divine. And the black models used = amazing

  86. Basement

    May 13, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    I love this, I think it's beautiful!! I think it's actually very sensual…. I think it's divine. And the black models used = amazing

  87. anonymous

    May 14, 2010 at 9:24 am

    it reminds me of that awful "rave" scene in Matrix Revolutions
    http://www.scene-stealers.com/wp-content/uploads/

    vom!

  88. anonymous

    May 14, 2010 at 9:24 am

    it reminds me of that awful "rave" scene in Matrix Revolutions
    http://www.scene-stealers.com/wp-content/uploads/

    vom!

  89. anonymous

    May 14, 2010 at 2:24 am

    it reminds me of that awful "rave" scene in Matrix Revolutions
    http://www.scene-stealers.com/wp-content/uploads/

    vom!

  90. Ackermann.

    May 15, 2010 at 12:00 pm

    Now that is steamy!
    At least it is something really different.

  91. Ackermann.

    May 15, 2010 at 12:00 pm

    Now that is steamy!
    At least it is something really different.

  92. Ackermann.

    May 15, 2010 at 5:00 am

    Now that is steamy!
    At least it is something really different.

  93. collaborationetc

    May 16, 2010 at 3:55 am

    love the depth but she isn't connected at all to the rest of the characters. it was poorly played. but i guess there are only two ways to go with this tired formula, have her integrate and happy to discover these "new" people or have her be completely disconnected and uninterested.
    http://www.collaborationetc.wordpress.com

  94. collaborationetc

    May 16, 2010 at 3:55 am

    love the depth but she isn't connected at all to the rest of the characters. it was poorly played. but i guess there are only two ways to go with this tired formula, have her integrate and happy to discover these "new" people or have her be completely disconnected and uninterested.
    http://www.collaborationetc.wordpress.com

  95. collaborationetc

    May 15, 2010 at 8:55 pm

    love the depth but she isn't connected at all to the rest of the characters. it was poorly played. but i guess there are only two ways to go with this tired formula, have her integrate and happy to discover these "new" people or have her be completely disconnected and uninterested.
    http://www.collaborationetc.wordpress.com

  96. Lenka James

    May 17, 2010 at 1:38 am

    those photos are nice..Daria is so versatile as a model

  97. Lenka James

    May 17, 2010 at 1:38 am

    those photos are nice..Daria is so versatile as a model

  98. Lenka James

    May 16, 2010 at 6:38 pm

    those photos are nice..Daria is so versatile as a model

  99. sjn

    May 20, 2010 at 11:09 am

    more black models!!

  100. sjn

    May 20, 2010 at 11:09 am

    more black models!!

  101. sjn

    May 20, 2010 at 4:09 am

    more black models!!

  102. chernshinn

    June 15, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    amazing

  103. chernshinn

    June 15, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    amazing

  104. chernshinn

    June 15, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    amazing

  105. chernshinn

    June 16, 2010 at 3:50 am

    amazing

  106. chernshinn

    June 15, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    amazing

  107. sonia

    August 10, 2010 at 5:05 am

    I think this shoot is incredibly beautiful. It's art. It's tastefully done. One must appreciate the amount of work & budget that has gone into it.
    Very clever!!

  108. sonia

    August 9, 2010 at 10:05 pm

    I think this shoot is incredibly beautiful. It's art. It's tastefully done. One must appreciate the amount of work & budget that has gone into it.
    Very clever!!

  109. Joyclyn-vines

    March 25, 2011 at 7:50 pm

    I’m torn… I love a good photo spread of delectibly dirty good fashion, and an interesting plot line to it. BUT I’m getting a little tired of them always putting in the white hope amongst the dirty low black people . Like they do most in movies. Portraying the innocent pure white girl lost forever in the black pit of Negro scum. Or the great white man who comes and purges the black community of its evils making everything right again, (after being tainted by us that is) and making it better. With this spread, even as there were some photos displaying souly the black models (only 2) I feel it was wasted by this worn out stereotypical thinking. They SHOULD have balanced it out, did half this way, and the other half with a black girl surrounded by white people. The theme: A real and natural beauty of the earth surrounded by materialistic, egotistical, tyrants. Don’t make me out to be a revived black panther,I love ALL races and their ancestral cultures along with it, but I’m just tired of seeing this “Black out” theme, not just with black people but any darker ethnic race. Everywhere! Doing it in the name of being artistic, being creative when its dull and tacky, being controversial for publicity? Just being a jerk under another name. Art shouldn’t be controlled, but it shouldn’t have to hurt a paticuliar group/community. They should try a challenge for themselves to make us think, question and shock us without offending .Thats artistic. There are so many ways this couldv’e gone…

  110. Joyclyn-vines

    March 25, 2011 at 7:50 pm

    I’m torn… I love a good photo spread of delectibly dirty good fashion, and an interesting plot line to it. BUT I’m getting a little tired of them always putting in the white hope amongst the dirty low black people . Like they do most in movies. Portraying the innocent pure white girl lost forever in the black pit of Negro scum. Or the great white man who comes and purges the black community of its evils making everything right again, (after being tainted by us that is) and making it better. With this spread, even as there were some photos displaying souly the black models (only 2) I feel it was wasted by this worn out stereotypical thinking. They SHOULD have balanced it out, did half this way, and the other half with a black girl surrounded by white people. The theme: A real and natural beauty of the earth surrounded by materialistic, egotistical, tyrants. Don’t make me out to be a revived black panther,I love ALL races and their ancestral cultures along with it, but I’m just tired of seeing this “Black out” theme, not just with black people but any darker ethnic race. Everywhere! Doing it in the name of being artistic, being creative when its dull and tacky, being controversial for publicity? Just being a jerk under another name. Art shouldn’t be controlled, but it shouldn’t have to hurt a paticuliar group/community. They should try a challenge for themselves to make us think, question and shock us without offending .Thats artistic. There are so many ways this couldv’e gone…

  111. Joyclyn-vines

    March 25, 2011 at 7:50 pm

    I’m torn… I love a good photo spread of delectibly dirty good fashion, and an interesting plot line to it. BUT I’m getting a little tired of them always putting in the white hope amongst the dirty low black people . Like they do most in movies. Portraying the innocent pure white girl lost forever in the black pit of Negro scum. Or the great white man who comes and purges the black community of its evils making everything right again, (after being tainted by us that is) and making it better. With this spread, even as there were some photos displaying souly the black models (only 2) I feel it was wasted by this worn out stereotypical thinking. They SHOULD have balanced it out, did half this way, and the other half with a black girl surrounded by white people. The theme: A real and natural beauty of the earth surrounded by materialistic, egotistical, tyrants. Don’t make me out to be a revived black panther,I love ALL races and their ancestral cultures along with it, but I’m just tired of seeing this “Black out” theme, not just with black people but any darker ethnic race. Everywhere! Doing it in the name of being artistic, being creative when its dull and tacky, being controversial for publicity? Just being a jerk under another name. Art shouldn’t be controlled, but it shouldn’t have to hurt a paticuliar group/community. They should try a challenge for themselves to make us think, question and shock us without offending .Thats artistic. There are so many ways this couldv’e gone…

  112. Ss

    June 21, 2011 at 3:28 pm

    Mmm disturbed me, I cannot deny the great photography, but really? the white girl that shines on top of a mass of black people? Even the photo without her gave the black models dark clothing…I really can’t comprehend this spread.

  113. Ss

    June 21, 2011 at 3:28 pm

    Mmm disturbed me, I cannot deny the great photography, but really? the white girl that shines on top of a mass of black people? Even the photo without her gave the black models dark clothing…I really can’t comprehend this spread.

  114. Ss

    June 21, 2011 at 3:28 pm

    Mmm disturbed me, I cannot deny the great photography, but really? the white girl that shines on top of a mass of black people? Even the photo without her gave the black models dark clothing…I really can’t comprehend this spread.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Ajak Deng