Connect
To Top

Chanel Iman for Rosa Cha Spring 2011 Campaign by Gui Paganini

Chanel Iman takes a trip to tropical forests for Rosa Cha’s most recent advertising campaign. Last time we saw the American beauty, she was wearing fall fashions in an Elle Italia shoot, and now she looks ready for warmer weather in the Brazilian label’s spring 2011 campaign. Photographed by Gui Paganini and with retouching by Alex Wink of Studio AW, Chanel dons the label’s colorful swimsuits, casual wear and lingerie.












44 Comments

  1. Jaguar_running

    October 26, 2010 at 1:48 am

    I find it interesting that the retoucher was named. Are they trying to become as well known as photographers or models now too?

    • Simmy

      October 26, 2010 at 2:23 am

      This is a hard and essential work on fashion photography, I just think it took too long to be recognized

    • Anonymous

      October 26, 2010 at 3:47 pm

      Two possible reasons:

      A lot of international publications list them, just as you would make-up artist, stylist, photographer, etc. They are essential to images, so Rosa Cha might’ve done it for that.

      Some publications also credit them when no money is involved. So it’s possible this was retouched for free but for a credit. I doubt this, since it’s a campaign (which pays a lot more money than editorial) but anything’s possible.

    • Hellopretty2

      November 1, 2010 at 2:13 pm

      There’s no retoucher listed here http://oceandrive.com/celebrities/articles/chanel-iman-bares-all but if you watch the behind the scenes video they have on her they def retouched! It looks like she has bug bites on her legs….ew.

  2. Karolina

    October 26, 2010 at 6:25 am

    I just don’t like her mouth, and her body is so skinny! I know she is a nice girl, but I have no pleasure to watch her on the photographs.

  3. Karolina

    October 26, 2010 at 6:25 am

    I just don’t like her mouth, and her body is so skinny! I know she is a nice girl, but I have no pleasure to watch her on the photographs.

  4. Sebastian Kubatz

    October 26, 2010 at 6:49 am

    nice location, lovely girl… what else do you want?

    .
    new pics online:
    http://blog.sebastiankubatz.de

    .
    cheers,
    sebastian

  5. Liz

    October 26, 2010 at 7:15 am

    She’s amazingly beautiful and I wish I had her legs but she has the same facial expression in every single picture!

  6. Stacey_xs

    October 26, 2010 at 7:27 am

    quite boring and i do not find her attractive one bit.

  7. Wierzbinska

    October 26, 2010 at 8:12 am

    Her face on the second photo…

  8. florence

    October 26, 2010 at 8:20 am

    where is the good old days naomi when you need her? Chanel has no sex appeal and those swimsuits are therefore undermined. I personally would much rather see a sexy confident swimwear model than a skinny, bland- blank -faced model. And I am a woman:)

    • Anonymous

      October 26, 2010 at 3:52 pm

      I agree. I think Chanel is quite beautiful, but she doesn’t have the sex appeal to wear these.

      On the other hand, Rosa Cha might be going for a non-sexy look, opting for just a regular young ‘girl-next-door’ (albeit one who is like 90 lbs.) It all comes down to marketing.

  9. Sequin Gown

    October 26, 2010 at 9:21 am

    Her face is just amazing, but I wish she would work on her poses and facial expressions. Miss Naomi too, Chanel could get herself inspired by looking at some of her photos.

  10. Longers

    October 26, 2010 at 10:18 am

    she looks cheap

  11. ania

    October 26, 2010 at 10:52 am

    nice shots, but I really don’t like Chanel.

  12. SET

    October 26, 2010 at 11:01 am

    Her skin is amazing. Pretty girl.

  13. SET

    October 26, 2010 at 11:01 am

    Her skin is amazing. Pretty girl.

  14. Gura

    October 26, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    the photos that she’s bend look so bad like she has cramps or something and that poker face… I truly wish , she would be more versatile.

  15. Gura

    October 26, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    the photos that she’s bend look so bad like she has cramps or something and that poker face… I truly wish , she would be more versatile.

  16. Seleniot

    October 26, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    same face in every photo..also head +neck in photo 3 have been pasted on photo 2..good job alex wink!!!!
    we’re not blind

  17. Seleniot

    October 26, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    same face in every photo..also head +neck in photo 3 have been pasted on photo 2..good job alex wink!!!!
    we’re not blind

  18. Jabari Turbocity Holmes

    October 26, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    Oh, so now Chanel Iman is unattractive? Hilarious. The internets is truly a funny place. She looks greeeeeeeat like a bowl of Frosted Flakes.

    • Alicia Viarruel

      October 27, 2010 at 6:55 pm

      i don’t think people are saying she’s unattractive. it’s a matter of her being unattractive for this shoot because her body type doesn’t truly compliment what she’s modelling.

  19. Anonymous

    October 26, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    Chanel just looks awkward in photos. Her face is literally exactly the same, and there is no life in her eyes. She has such beautiful and long body, but zero utilization for it.

  20. Anonymous

    October 26, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    Chanel just looks awkward in photos. Her face is literally exactly the same, and there is no life in her eyes. She has such beautiful and long body, but zero utilization for it.

  21. Josefina

    October 26, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    I love Alexandre Herchcovitch.

  22. Anna_steiny

    October 26, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    Why does she always hunch? seriously

  23. Andrew

    October 26, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    again aguinaldo paganini with a too photoshoped campaign.
    it’s too much again…

  24. Anastasia Beverhausen

    October 26, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    cheap looking, boring, vapid, lifeless. well done!

  25. nick

    October 26, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    cheap looking, boring, vapid, lifeless. well done! (2)

  26. nick

    October 26, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    cheap looking, boring, vapid, lifeless. well done! (2)

  27. Collaborationetc

    October 26, 2010 at 10:55 pm

    She is just too straight for this type of campaign. I really do not understand why first Victorias Secret and now Rosa Cha would choose a girl with no curves. She is hunched over in each shot to create curves and help create some cleavage, chicken cutlets aren’t miracle workers. When she first arrived on the scene I thought she would marketed as the baby doll Gemma Ward look. That makes more sense then this direction.

    http://www.collaborationetc.wordpress.com

  28. Csarky

    October 26, 2010 at 11:36 pm

    sexy isn’t really Chanel Iman’s thing. an A or AA or other small cup size woman can still be super sexy. Chanel Iman just isn’t selling it to me. also why is her mouth always open?

  29. giuliana

    October 27, 2010 at 12:03 am

    why so slouchy?

  30. Grib

    October 27, 2010 at 12:09 am

    She has a nice body, but look at her face in the shot below the pants, brown bag and bandeau frame. It’s strained and awkward.

    She looks lovely in most of her eds/campaigns though. I blame the photographer or whoever chose the shots. Rosa Cha is a top dog and this is so bland. Swimwear is such a boring market. Every year I spend weeks looking for just one cool set or piece. They’re either too boring, too frumpy, too embelished, too complicated or too expensive. Why aren’t there more anologies to fashion in genereal in swimwear?

  31. Grib

    October 27, 2010 at 12:09 am

    She has a nice body, but look at her face in the shot below the pants, brown bag and bandeau frame. It’s strained and awkward.

    She looks lovely in most of her eds/campaigns though. I blame the photographer or whoever chose the shots. Rosa Cha is a top dog and this is so bland. Swimwear is such a boring market. Every year I spend weeks looking for just one cool set or piece. They’re either too boring, too frumpy, too embelished, too complicated or too expensive. Why aren’t there more anologies to fashion in genereal in swimwear?

  32. Lalgirl_1

    October 27, 2010 at 1:14 am

    The high waisted pants made me want to feed her; then I saw the two bathing suit shots that followed and I heard my stomache growl; then I saw her in the lingerie and completely lost my appetite. EAT SOMETHING!

  33. Lalgirl_1

    October 27, 2010 at 1:14 am

    The high waisted pants made me want to feed her; then I saw the two bathing suit shots that followed and I heard my stomache growl; then I saw her in the lingerie and completely lost my appetite. EAT SOMETHING!

  34. Alicia Viarruel

    October 27, 2010 at 6:51 pm

    chanel has beautiful skin and is generally a nice looking girl. having said that, i think she is more of a runway model than anything else – which is evident by the fact that she has almost one facial expression in every frame. she has no appeal to me in this shoot as a swimsuit model because it made me think these two things over and over: “where are the curves that should really showcase this swimsuit/lingerie?” and “wow, she is really thin”. that’s not something you should want people to think looking at a shoot like this. just saying.

  35. steven

    November 3, 2010 at 5:30 am

    she is fucking horrible. one expression.

  36. naturally thin

    November 4, 2010 at 8:26 pm

    … do you people realize that all your “eat something, skinny girl!” nonsense is just as insulting and disgusting as telling overweight people to put down the food? either way, you’re telling someone they’re gross, exacerbating extremes on both sides of the spectrum? perhaps you’re jealous that you yourself can’t help but gorge yourself on food, can’t motivate yourself to get off the sofa and jog around the block, and compensate for this by criticizing others? perhaps you’re sad that you’re average? perhaps you’re not intelligent enough to realize that some people have naturally higher metabolisms and can eat all the cheeseburgers they want and never gain weight? it’s hilarious that people who have absolutely no frame of reference are so quick to judge others – you know nothing about the shoot, how many expressions she made during it, what her eating habits are, and the fact that the editor chose these particular shots means she’s “fucking horrible” … lets see you do a better job. maybe put down the pasta sandwich and go for a run.

    • Eniarrol

      March 11, 2011 at 11:27 am

      you’re assuming too much from a simple comment for her to eat;) don’t get too worked up. life’s like that. indeed overweight people need to put down their food and underweight models doing lingerie ads would look better if they were less bony, whether they have already been eating very little/a lot or not. whether these overweight people have naturally lower metabolisms and these underweight models have naturally higher metabolisms don’t change the fact that they would have looked better with more/less weight. and even if she’s already eating a lot, it’s a comment to indicate that she would looked better if she ate more. and yes, it’s possible if you tried. i’m not sure if you have it your country but Ensure does wonders.

  37. Emilie

    November 5, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    GORGEOUS!!!!

  38. Ms DeMoyo

    November 5, 2010 at 7:30 pm

    she would look amazing in my clothes …. http://www.artdemoyo.com/blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

More in 2010