Bregje Heinen by Signe Vilstrup in L’idole Éternelle | Tush Spring 2010

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published May 7, 2010

Photographer Signe Vilstrup takes the meaning of the word statuesque to a whole other level for the latest issue of Tush, as he captures Bregje Heinen looking absolutely stunning in L’idole Eternelle. Styled by Wiebke Bredehorst, the model dons ensembles from Versace, D&G, Dior and others as she poses alongside her sculpted companions.













source | helligirl @ tfs


Recent Updates

Denim Story Feature

Exclusive: Alina & Jette by Carmelo Donato in ‘Denim Remixed’

In a striking fashion feature captured by Carmelo Donato, FGR's latest exclusive focuses on denim, with models Alina Enders and ...
Logan Hollowell Silk Collection

Logan Hollowell’s Silk Collection Delivers Goddess Glam

Logan Hollowell, known for its fine jewelry, ventures into ready-to-wear with the debut of its Silk Collection. The 100% silk ...
Ana de Armas Estee Lauder

Ana de Armas is a Vision in Estée Lauder Lipstick Ad

Ana de Armas captivates in Estée Lauder's latest advertisement, embracing the opulent glow of the new Re-Nutriv Diamond Serum Lipcolor ...
Spell Bohemian Royale

Spell’s Bohemian Royale Print Gets an Eco-Chic Makeover

Spell's latest Renew collection marks a decade of the beloved Bohemian Royale print, demonstrating the brand's commitment to sustainable fashion ...
Kylie Jenner KHY Denim

Kylie Jenner Heats Up Denim With Khy Drop 005 Collection

Khy, the brand driven by Kylie Jenner's fashion instincts, presents its latest creation, Drop 005, a collection focusing on denim ...
Zuhair Murad Bridal Spring 2025

Zuhair Murad Bridal’s Spring 2025 Dresses Are a Must-See

Zuhair Murad's Bridal Spring 2025 collection is a captivating tribute to ancient Phoenician culture, weaving historical opulence with modern bridal ...

91 thoughts on “Bregje Heinen by Signe Vilstrup in L’idole Éternelle | Tush Spring 2010”

  1. the body is a beautiful thing, when is she supposed to show it off when she's 50 and wrinkly? because that's the only time it will be accepted and she wont have to worry about her parents seeing it?

    Reply
  2. the body is a beautiful thing, when is she supposed to show it off when she's 50 and wrinkly? because that's the only time it will be accepted and she wont have to worry about her parents seeing it?

    Reply
  3. if people are offended about nudity in fashion they shouldn’t be near or viewing these natural talent and aesthetics in art and fashion! They are just plain stupid narrow minded people nothing better to do!!!

    Reply
    • The objection is not to nudity, I appreciate nudity. I think the female body is beautiful, I don't think however, that girls who are 16 should be exploited in such a way.

      Reply
      • Exactly what about this is exploitative? It's not like she's shooting a porno…these are soft, tasteful images. Nothing about this suggests to me that she was mistreated or coerced in any way.

        Reply
      • Exactly what about this is exploitative? It's not like she's shooting a porno…these are soft, tasteful images. Nothing about this suggests to me that she was mistreated or coerced in any way.

        Reply
        • K.D. – you're a dolt. There is no exploitation here as 'banana' explained. I think something all opposed are forgetting too is the fact that this is IMPLIED. Get over it and appreciate it for what it is or you can opt to x out the page.

          Reply
          • Everybody has their own opinion and is entitled to express it. But there's no need to call someone who is respectfully expressing their opinion a "dolt" just because you disagree with them.

          • Everybody has their own opinion and is entitled to express it. But there's no need to call someone who is respectfully expressing their opinion a "dolt" just because you disagree with them.

        • K.D. – you're a dolt. There is no exploitation here as 'banana' explained. I think something all opposed are forgetting too is the fact that this is IMPLIED. Get over it and appreciate it for what it is or you can opt to x out the page.

          Reply
    • The objection is not to nudity, I appreciate nudity. I think the female body is beautiful, I don't think however, that girls who are 16 should be exploited in such a way.

      Reply
  4. if people are offended about nudity in fashion they shouldn’t be near or viewing these natural talent and aesthetics in art and fashion! They are just plain stupid narrow minded people nothing better to do!!!

    Reply
  5. if people are offended about nudity in fashion they shouldn’t be near or viewing these natural talent and aesthetics in art and fashion! They are just plain stupid narrow minded people nothing better to do!!!

    Reply
    • The objection is not to nudity, I appreciate nudity. I think the female body is beautiful, I don't think however, that girls who are 16 should be exploited in such a way.

      Reply
      • Exactly what about this is exploitative? It's not like she's shooting a porno…these are soft, tasteful images. Nothing about this suggests to me that she was mistreated or coerced in any way.

        Reply
        • K.D. – you're a dolt. There is no exploitation here as 'banana' explained. I think something all opposed are forgetting too is the fact that this is IMPLIED. Get over it and appreciate it for what it is or you can opt to x out the page.

          Reply
          • Everybody has their own opinion and is entitled to express it. But there's no need to call someone who is respectfully expressing their opinion a "dolt" just because you disagree with them.

  6. she IS 16 or 17 or whatever, BUT she is NOT exploited!!!! She is doing this because she WANTS TO! she models because she wants to , because shes good at it and she can and she can make a lot of money to do it. Girls who go into modeling KNOW what they are getting into, and agencies ALWAYS ask what they are and are not comfortable doing. Coco Rocha said she will never pose nude or topless and she hasn't. Its the same argument as with Terry Richardson, people who say he forces girls to do things they dont want to do, when you know you are going to have a shoot with Terry you KNOW you will be doing something sexual, it is your CHOICE whether or not you decide to go in or not, whether you will regret it later that's another cup of tea, but there should not even be a question of exploitation.

    Reply
  7. she IS 16 or 17 or whatever, BUT she is NOT exploited!!!! She is doing this because she WANTS TO! she models because she wants to , because shes good at it and she can and she can make a lot of money to do it. Girls who go into modeling KNOW what they are getting into, and agencies ALWAYS ask what they are and are not comfortable doing. Coco Rocha said she will never pose nude or topless and she hasn't. Its the same argument as with Terry Richardson, people who say he forces girls to do things they dont want to do, when you know you are going to have a shoot with Terry you KNOW you will be doing something sexual, it is your CHOICE whether or not you decide to go in or not, whether you will regret it later that's another cup of tea, but there should not even be a question of exploitation.

    Reply
  8. she IS 16 or 17 or whatever, BUT she is NOT exploited!!!! She is doing this because she WANTS TO! she models because she wants to , because shes good at it and she can and she can make a lot of money to do it. Girls who go into modeling KNOW what they are getting into, and agencies ALWAYS ask what they are and are not comfortable doing. Coco Rocha said she will never pose nude or topless and she hasn't. Its the same argument as with Terry Richardson, people who say he forces girls to do things they dont want to do, when you know you are going to have a shoot with Terry you KNOW you will be doing something sexual, it is your CHOICE whether or not you decide to go in or not, whether you will regret it later that's another cup of tea, but there should not even be a question of exploitation.

    Reply
  9. Regardless of the age drama folks (in America!)… she was shot in Europe where she was OF AGE for photos… as are the laws of the land.

    The laws apply to where the model is standing, not where the viewer is sitting.

    And besides… GET OVER IT!!!

    Reply
  10. Regardless of the age drama folks (in America!)… she was shot in Europe where she was OF AGE for photos… as are the laws of the land.

    The laws apply to where the model is standing, not where the viewer is sitting.

    And besides… GET OVER IT!!!

    Reply
  11. Regardless of the age drama folks (in America!)… she was shot in Europe where she was OF AGE for photos… as are the laws of the land.

    The laws apply to where the model is standing, not where the viewer is sitting.

    And besides… GET OVER IT!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Gaelle Cancel reply