Connect
To Top

Blumarine Spring 2011 Campaign | Edita Vilkeviciute & Magdalena Frackowiak by Terry Richardson

Enlisting Terry Richardson to shoot a sexy and somewhat even raunchy campaign, Blumarine takes Edita Vilkeviciute and Magdalena Frackowiak on a sizzling night adventure for spring 2011. Wearing the label’s signature animal prints and seventies inspired silhouettes, Edita and Magdalena take the night in the smoldering advertisements.










41 Comments

  1. Eugene

    January 11, 2011 at 8:25 pm

    I mean, Jesus. Terry should have been a street life photographer or a pornographer. But fashion?

  2. Anonymous

    January 11, 2011 at 8:31 pm

    Its not even Terry at this point. Entire Blumarine collection is a tackfest of epic proportions. You CANNOT make those dresses look classy, no matter the photographer. Everything about this is very porno. The hair, makeup, poses, dresses….and please tell me if anyone ANYWHERE has ever witnessed a baby blue cheetah???

  3. Veronicabcn1990

    January 11, 2011 at 9:22 pm

    god, is really anyone going to pay hundreds for any of those garments? you can get better things for 1 euro in a market…

  4. Veronicabcn1990

    January 11, 2011 at 9:22 pm

    god, is really anyone going to pay hundreds for any of those garments? you can get better things for 1 euro in a market…

  5. Cozarro

    January 11, 2011 at 9:41 pm

    Say what you want, Magdalena looks extremely sexy

    • aud

      January 11, 2011 at 9:47 pm

      yeah. that’s true. She looks sexy. Almost like a slut. Anybody else could have take those picture. anybody who like pornography

  6. maddie

    January 11, 2011 at 10:00 pm

    Ugh. Terry and Blumarine. What a horrible, horrible combo.

  7. maddie

    January 11, 2011 at 10:00 pm

    Ugh. Terry and Blumarine. What a horrible, horrible combo.

  8. anonymous

    January 11, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    It’s trying too hard, it’s a tacky joke. Edita and Magda are beautiful, but so what? They still look ridiculous here.

  9. anonymous

    January 11, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    It’s trying too hard, it’s a tacky joke. Edita and Magda are beautiful, but so what? They still look ridiculous here.

  10. Anonymous

    January 11, 2011 at 10:39 pm

    Bizarre that they chose the Boom Boom Room as the location

  11. Anonymous

    January 11, 2011 at 10:39 pm

    Bizarre that they chose the Boom Boom Room as the location

  12. a.

    January 11, 2011 at 11:32 pm

    I wished on 1-11-11 11:11 that Terry Richardson would never work again. Still hoping that this will come true. Sexual deviants who exploit underage girls should be banned from going near the fashion industry.

  13. Cozarro

    January 11, 2011 at 11:37 pm

    God, what a conservatism in here, this whole session is a joke made you people talk about it

    • anonymous

      January 12, 2011 at 1:33 am

      We’re talking about it and it’s still shitty and not adding anything to the fashion industry.

    • anonymous

      January 12, 2011 at 1:33 am

      We’re talking about it and it’s still shitty and not adding anything to the fashion industry.

    • Anonymous

      January 12, 2011 at 5:21 pm

      Has NOTHING to do with conservatism. You are clueless to what that word even means. Its called criticism, and unanimous vote appears to be that this ad SUCKS!

    • Anonymous

      January 12, 2011 at 5:21 pm

      Has NOTHING to do with conservatism. You are clueless to what that word even means. Its called criticism, and unanimous vote appears to be that this ad SUCKS!

    • Anonymous

      January 12, 2011 at 5:21 pm

      Has NOTHING to do with conservatism. You are clueless to what that word even means. Its called criticism, and unanimous vote appears to be that this ad SUCKS!

  14. Anonymous

    January 12, 2011 at 12:19 am

    yes as soon as i saw this i was like why is this in the boom boom room? has no relation to the collection..and the girls who there wouldnt wear that either

  15. Anonymous

    January 12, 2011 at 12:19 am

    yes as soon as i saw this i was like why is this in the boom boom room? has no relation to the collection..and the girls who there wouldnt wear that either

  16. Stephen Dimmick

    January 12, 2011 at 1:18 am

    Terry doing Terry.. LOVE IT>>

  17. Stephen Dimmick

    January 12, 2011 at 1:18 am

    Terry doing Terry.. LOVE IT>>

  18. Mel Couteau

    January 12, 2011 at 1:53 am

    This is so overt that it becomes unsexy. It completely tries too hard.

  19. Dawn Bey

    January 12, 2011 at 5:42 am

    Terry just changed the name of Blumarine. The pictures don’t match the label’s image!

    • Anonymous

      January 12, 2011 at 5:22 pm

      They are both tacky, so I think they match PERFECTLY.

    • Anonymous

      January 12, 2011 at 5:22 pm

      They are both tacky, so I think they match PERFECTLY.

  20. Dawn Bey

    January 12, 2011 at 5:42 am

    Terry just changed the name of Blumarine. The pictures don’t match the label’s image!

  21. Isabel

    January 12, 2011 at 10:13 am

    tack-eeee

  22. Isabel

    January 12, 2011 at 10:13 am

    tack-eeee

  23. Anonymous

    January 12, 2011 at 6:27 pm

    I don’t see Blumarine sold in stores so I never thought of the label as tacky but after these photos and reading some of the comments I understand it more. This is like… worse than Bebe or Judy’s.

  24. JVA

    January 12, 2011 at 7:06 pm

    If you want raunchy …Mr.Richardson is the man!

  25. Fashionchic Nyc

    January 12, 2011 at 10:10 pm

    Clearly none of the people commenting on the ad campaign for Blumarine GET IT. Fashion is supposed to be fun and the ads are purposely styled to make an impact and if anyone doesn’t get that go back to Gap and buy some crap.

    • a.

      January 13, 2011 at 5:52 am

      Get WHAT? Cheap looking clothes and bad styling?

    • a.

      January 13, 2011 at 5:52 am

      Get WHAT? Cheap looking clothes and bad styling?

  26. Baby_d_angel

    February 1, 2011 at 11:46 pm

    Honestly i was just talking about how i wish i lived in the 1970s..the first dress is unreal..i want it ! and the bathing suit it soo cute! cant wait till the weather warms up!

    http://denise-clay.blogspot.com/

  27. Baby_d_angel

    February 1, 2011 at 11:46 pm

    Honestly i was just talking about how i wish i lived in the 1970s..the first dress is unreal..i want it ! and the bathing suit it soo cute! cant wait till the weather warms up!

    http://denise-clay.blogspot.com/

  28. Baby_d_angel

    February 1, 2011 at 11:46 pm

    Honestly i was just talking about how i wish i lived in the 1970s..the first dress is unreal..i want it ! and the bathing suit it soo cute! cant wait till the weather warms up!

    http://denise-clay.blogspot.com/

  29. Isabelle

    April 4, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    oh!!!! whoever styled it needs to be removed from Fashion industry ASAP!!!!! poor girls they look terrible,TACKY!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

More in 2011